We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Renewable Energy Act
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2179
Description[?]:
Look to the future. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:04:28, February 01, 2006 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the Renewable Energy Act |
Message | There isn't much in this bill to support is there. |
Date | 22:40:10, February 01, 2006 CET | From | Monkeygnome Party | To | Debating the Renewable Energy Act |
Message | No! We refuse to look to the future! Status quo now! |
Date | 22:43:47, February 01, 2006 CET | From | Populist Conservative Party | To | Debating the Renewable Energy Act |
Message | Uh.... |
Date | 22:47:37, February 01, 2006 CET | From | Apathetic Sort-of-Federation | To | Debating the Renewable Energy Act |
Message | We oppose. |
Date | 22:55:32, February 01, 2006 CET | From | Federalists Party | To | Debating the Renewable Energy Act |
Message | lol, I shouldn't laugh though because I've done this very thing before (minus the looking to the future bit). |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 49 | ||||||||
no |
Total Seats: 451 | ||||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "When women are depressed, they either eat or go shopping. Men invade another country. It's a whole different way of thinking." - Elaine Boosler |