Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 00:59:07
Server time: 07:00:52, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Justice Reform I a 4112

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nationale Partei des Volkes

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 4113

Description[?]:

-

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:53:32, October 29, 2016 CET
FromFortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Justice Reform I a 4112
MessageHerr Speaker,

Although we can respect why this has been proposed, we oppose because we think representation in court is a fundamental right, whether you can afford it or not. We don't believe it is something that one SHOULD have to pay for if they're not on low incomes, and that private representation should merely be an option for those who wish to hire as such.

Ken Knochen, Parliamentary Leader of the Opposition

Date16:47:05, October 29, 2016 CET
FromNationale Partei des Volkes
ToDebating the Justice Reform I a 4112
MessageHerr Knochen,

I know that it is a basic right. I don't know how do you understand words "defendant with low incomes", but for me it's a person that doesn't have enough money (and incomes) to live above the poverty line, after paying for the lawyer. We just want to maintain a stable economy, without making people homeless.

Ferdinand von Braun (NPdV) - State Chancellor of the Dorvish Republic

Date17:24:41, October 29, 2016 CET
FromFortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Justice Reform I a 4112
MessageState Chancellor,

This proposal would include families on relatively average incomes, having to pay for representation for these families although it will not send them into poverty, will make a large and noticeable dent on their finances. However as we have said we can well understand why your party has proposed this.

Paula Fürst, Parliamentary Leader of the Opposition

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 169

no
    

Total Seats: 331

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: In your Message Centre there is a really useful feature which allows you to subscribe to all of the bill debates in your nation. If you use that, then the "Watched Discussions" section will show you every time a new message has been posted on a bill. You can also subscribe to other pages you want to follow, such as your nation message-board, party organisations or bills outside your nation which you are interested in.

    Random quote: "The key to understanding the American system is to imagine that you have the power to make nearly any law you want, but your worst enemy will be the one to enforce it." - Rick Cook

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 49