We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forestry Act 4113
Details
Submitted by[?]: Patriotic Party of Baltusia
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4114
Description[?]:
To move further away from the regulation and red tape which is damaging business and job creation more than it is protecting the environment and our woodlands. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: The government has no policy on forest protection.
Current: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Proposed: The government promotes forest clearance.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments may set up forestry agencies. Where they do not, forestry is on a commercial basis.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: All forestry is performed by private companies.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government designates ecological preservation zones but does not fund their oversight.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:15:18, October 31, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Forestry Act 4113 |
Message | Thousands of jobs can be created in the logging industry through this deregulation, boosting the economy and making us a major player in this sector internationally. By designating eco zones at the same time we can protect those areas of special scientific interest and wildlife habitats that really need protecting without spending billion on unnecessary regulations. Thank you Xander Fisk, Patriotic Party Trade and Industry Spokesperson |
Date | 15:58:37, October 31, 2016 CET | From | Revolutionary Anarchist Black Army(RABA) | To | Debating the Forestry Act 4113 |
Message | further power grab from the local goverments is not tolerated, private bussniess is if anything worse at creating good jobs Cathrine Charleson Leader of the syndicalists |
Date | 17:48:28, October 31, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Syndicalists | To | Debating the Forestry Act 4113 |
Message | cutting red tape is a right wing slogan for hurting workers and getting money in their pockets also this Will ruin the environment Katherine Benn RAC Leader |
Date | 18:07:28, October 31, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Forestry Act 4113 |
Message | How predictable your response is, Ms Benn. What about the thousands of servicemen and women who no longer have jobs because you and your stubborn left-wing friends would rather play political games than up the defence budget - even though you know your quasi-pacifism is completely out of touch? We are trying to create employment here and put money back into the economy - it is you and your Left Bloc friends who are hurting workers... and harming this nation's security capability at the same time. Xander Fisk Patriotic Party Trade and Industry Spokesperson. |
Date | 04:42:22, November 02, 2016 CET | From | Democratic Republicans | To | Debating the Forestry Act 4113 |
Message | we are going to be a party of conservation. there is no reason for us not to use our resources as long as we are able to keep them available for future generations. a different version of this bill that can conserve the forests we can approve, but not this iteration. |
Date | 11:02:19, November 02, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Forestry Act 4113 |
Message | We ask the Democratic Republicans to propose the bill that will conserve the forests while providing new jobs for the thousands of servicemen who are now unemployed. We would consider this. Thank you. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 294 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 406 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Did you know you can change the official name of your nation? All you need to do is draw up a new name that is in accordance with the Nation Renaming Guide, pass a bill proposing the name change with a two-thirds majority and then post a request to Moderation on the "Renaming Requests" thread. You can change city and region names in this way too. |
Random quote: "My tenure will be controversial and it is, quite obviously, true that I am the most right-wing Prime Minister this country has seen in several decades.” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician |