We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Federalist-Classical Cabinet Proposal of June 4113
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Federalist League
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4114
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet to ensure democracy, freedom, free trade, safety and sovereignty stay safe. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Classical Liberal Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the United Federalist League
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Classical Liberal Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Classical Liberal Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Classical Liberal Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the United Federalist League
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Classical Liberal Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the United Federalist League
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the United Federalist League
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Classical Liberal Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Classical Liberal Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the United Federalist League
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the United Federalist League
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:10:49, November 01, 2016 CET | From | Radical Democratic Party | To | Debating the Federalist-Classical Cabinet Proposal of June 4113 |
| Message | "I feel free to say that we deserve an equal government with all parties involved." This is what the UFL said on the last proposal. "We fully agree with the UNFL." This is the answer of the Classical Liberal Party. It's curious. Apparently you both did complain about the same thing (You wanted all parties involved in the cabinet) but when you have the chance to propose a cabinet you did exactly the opposite. I want an explanation if it's not too much to ask. |
| Date | 01:00:40, November 02, 2016 CET | From | United Federalist League | To | Debating the Federalist-Classical Cabinet Proposal of June 4113 |
| Message | We never got a say, you're coalition brought the rude cabinet proposal to a vote, so the UFL decided to do the same thing in defense. Don't speak poorly of us when you can't even unite the parties for a nation. Pathetic. |
| Date | 11:15:24, November 02, 2016 CET | From | Radical Democratic Party | To | Debating the Federalist-Classical Cabinet Proposal of June 4113 |
| Message | Rude cabinet proposal? Everyone is aloud to propose a new cabinet. It seems your level of intolerance is over 9000! Well, I didn't expect that kind of anti democratic vision. Maybe you did prefer the times when the FMC was the only party in Gaduridos...It might be your preference and your favourite model of Democracy, not mine, that's for sure. "Don't speak poorly of us when you can't even unite the parties for a nation. Pathetic." http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=490066. Just saying. |
| Date | 11:20:00, November 02, 2016 CET | From | Radical Democratic Party | To | Debating the Federalist-Classical Cabinet Proposal of June 4113 |
| Message | Rude cabinet proposal? Everyone is aloud to propose a new cabinet. It seems your level of intolerance is over 9000! Well, I didn't expect that kind of anti democratic vision. Maybe you did prefer the times when the FMC was the only party in Gaduridos...It might be your preference and your favourite model of Democracy, not mine, that's for sure. "Don't speak poorly of us when you can't even unite the parties for a nation. Pathetic." http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=490066. Just saying. |
| Date | 17:33:53, November 02, 2016 CET | From | Radical Democratic Party | To | Debating the Federalist-Classical Cabinet Proposal of June 4113 |
| Message | And by the way, the fact that the RDP has been in the government with 4 different parties for almost 16 years (and still) shows my ability to unite parties around a political program, and also my ability to form plural cabinets between different parties. The UFL is a new party in Gaduridos, we understand that. In your case I guess experience will help. Sometimes you win and sometimes you lose, you'll have your time, don't worry, but this is how Democracy works. Maybe the UFL has to wait a bit longer to achieve that. Good luck. |
| Date | 17:05:08, November 03, 2016 CET | From | Classical Liberal Party | To | Debating the Federalist-Classical Cabinet Proposal of June 4113 |
| Message | This is just you spewing your communist bull shit that is going to murder the people of this country, surrounded by these parties you say you unite but in reality are the same ideology as you, so really, congratulations on uniting the same team. Great accomplishment. Multiple times, the UNFL and CLP have attempted to reach out and broker any kind of compromise, to reflect the range of views held in Gaduridos. But you have replied with a resounding "fuck you" to anyone not on your side of the spectrum. |
| Date | 00:05:46, November 04, 2016 CET | From | Radical Democratic Party | To | Debating the Federalist-Classical Cabinet Proposal of June 4113 |
| Message | First of all sir you have to watch out your language. I know you are angry because once again you couldn't form a new cabinet. As I told UFL, sometimes you win and sometimes you lose, that's democracy. Sorry, you both ate your own words, next time think before saying that kind of things. Now tell me: The Social Conservative Party and Traditional Freedom Party were not on your side of the spectrum? Because you did rule this country with them years ago. I'm afraid their are not on the progressive side, so you are in a contradiction again, what a suprise!. Instead of acussing a legitimate government your party should put time on thinking why my party has been in the cabinet for 15 years. Let me make it easy for you: People did put the parties where they deserve, mine on the Goverment changing this country for good and yours wasting time insulting others. Those are the facts. Good luck! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 92 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 83 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 26 |
| Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
| Random quote: "Oh, judge, your damn laws: the good people don't need them and the bad people don't follow them so what good are they?" - Ammon Hennacy |