We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Progressive Conservative Economic Agenda Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4116
Description[?]:
| This is a set of changes that the PCLP wants to achieve so as to encourage private sector and lead to healthy competition |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on Democratic Workers' Councils.
Old value:: The government encourages the formation of Democratic Workers' Councils through subsidies and tax exemptions.
Current: The government encourages the formation of Democratic Workers' Councils through subsidies and tax exemptions.
Proposed: The government does not intervene in the marketplace with regards to Democratic Workers' Councils.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:45:26, November 04, 2016 CET | From |  Socialist People's Party (SPP) | To | Debating the Progressive Conservative Economic Agenda Bill |
| Message | This has its pros and cons. But ultimately the SPP is a party for the people and will not be able to support this. |
| Date | 12:50:09, November 04, 2016 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Progressive Conservative Economic Agenda Bill |
| Message | In some cases the government must mandate workers to ensure minimum service while on strike,If strikes happen regularly and if we do not ask workers from critical industries like education,healthcare,power and transportation to work atleast minimally during strikes then ehat will haopen. I do accept tge workers right to strike but not without minimal service |
| Date | 12:51:41, November 04, 2016 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Progressive Conservative Economic Agenda Bill |
| Message | What will happen instead of ehat will haopen and the insteag of tge,I am sorry for the spelling mistakes which happen when i type speedily |
| Date | 14:50:21, November 04, 2016 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Progressive Conservative Economic Agenda Bill |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We are against article one. Everyone should be able to strike. We do however support article 2. Terence Hunter, Leader LP |
| Date | 21:01:40, November 04, 2016 CET | From | Great Rutania Party | To | Debating the Progressive Conservative Economic Agenda Bill |
| Message | Mr speaker, We support both articles. The government shouldn't take a position on unions or councils because that makes them biased. The second article is acceptable, if you are a policeman or a doctor then if you strike you are putting people's life on the line by refusing to help people because of some petty reason. Thank you. Gordon Salterri Representative. |
| Date | 04:56:06, November 05, 2016 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Progressive Conservative Economic Agenda Bill |
| Message | I will propose article 1 in a separate bill |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 348 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 189 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 63 |
| Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information. |
| Random quote: "It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both." - Niccolo Machiavelli |