We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Inefficiency and regulations
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 4116
Description[?]:
| As part of our program we will go by a no nonsense approach and that continues in on this bill to reform what the government should and shouldn't do. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the stock exchange(s).
Old value:: The government owns the stock exchange(s).
Current: Stock exchanges are allowed but are regulated.
Proposed: Stock exchanges are allowed but are regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Policy on monopolies (this general law is superceded by other laws relating to specific parts of the economy).
Old value:: Monopolies are only forbidden in specific sectors of the economy.
Current: Monopolies are only actively enforced in specific sectors of the economy.
Proposed: Monopolies are only actively enforced in specific sectors of the economy.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on minimum wage regulation.
Old value:: There shall be a minimum wage at a level considered a "living wage," well above the poverty line for a full time worker.
Current: There shall be a minimum wage at a level considered a "living wage," well above the poverty line for a full time worker.
Proposed: There shall be a minimum wage at a level that a full time worker on it can support a family of four without falling under the poverty line.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:23:49, November 05, 2016 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Inefficiency and regulations |
| Message | Comrade speaker The Denocratic caucus is trying to make things worse for Kalistan. We agree with article 1. However we do not agree with 2 and 3. So we will oppose this bill. |
| Date | 17:47:32, November 05, 2016 CET | From | Socialist Party of Kalistan (SPoK) | To | Debating the Inefficiency and regulations |
| Message | Comrade Speaker, We would agree with Article 2 if separated out into a different bill. The other two would cause poverty to increase in Kalistan. We yield, and for the record, wish the SDC would leave bills open for debate longer, so some of the proposals they put up would have a chance for comment, amendment and possible passage through the Assembly. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 624 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 126 |
| Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/ |
| Random quote: "The substance of the eminent Socialist gentlemen's speech is that making a profit is a sin. It is my belief that the real sin is taking a loss!" - Winston Churchill |