We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of June 4118
Details
Submitted by[?]: Graasruuts
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4119
Description[?]:
The Graasruuts propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Socialist People's Republic of Beluzia. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 550,000 BEL | 945,000,000 BEL | 945,000,000 BEL |
Foreign Affairs | 220,000,000 BEL | 350,000,000 BEL | 350,000,000 BEL |
Internal Affairs | 1,300,000,000 BEL | 3,000,000,000 BEL | 3,000,000,000 BEL |
Finance | 1,000,000,000 BEL | 1,050,000,000 BEL | 1,050,000,000 BEL |
Defence | 1,070,000,000 BEL | 12,500,000,000 BEL | 12,500,000,000 BEL |
Justice | 9,300,000,000 BEL | 5,000,000,000 BEL | 5,000,000,000 BEL |
Infrastructure and Transport | 10,000,000,000 BEL | 6,000,000,000 BEL | 6,000,000,000 BEL |
Health and Social Services | 42,600,000,000 BEL | 31,000,000,000 BEL | 31,000,000,000 BEL |
Education and Culture | 50,000,000,000 BEL | 120,000,000,000 BEL | 120,000,000,000 BEL |
Science and Technology | 14,000,000,000 BEL | 5,900,000,000 BEL | 13,900,000,000 BEL |
Food and Agriculture | 13,000,000,000 BEL | 600,000,000 BEL | 600,000,000 BEL |
Environment and Tourism | 1,600,000,000 BEL | 9,000,000,000 BEL | 9,000,000,000 BEL |
Trade and Industry | 8,500,000,000 BEL | 19,000,000,000 BEL | 19,000,000,000 BEL |
Total | 152,590,550,000 BEL | 214,345,000,000 BEL | 222,345,000,000 BEL |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:49:35, November 10, 2016 CET | From | United Social Technocratic Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 4118 |
Message | This budget looks good to the UST. |
Date | 21:49:59, November 10, 2016 CET | From | Graasruuts | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 4118 |
Message | Please see our new spending bill, with an additional 8,000,000,000 committed towards Science and Technology |
Date | 22:01:14, November 10, 2016 CET | From | Libertarians of Beluzia | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 4118 |
Message | Doubling the assigned budget of a sector simply on the prospect of having unspent funds on our budget is insane. I would support a marginal increase in spending if it was offset by a reduction in spending. |
Date | 22:37:04, November 10, 2016 CET | From | Graasruuts | To | Debating the Budget proposal of June 4118 |
Message | We still have a surplus, we're just using some of it to continue developing nd avoid stagnation as well as compete internationally. MPB, I thought you supported the notion? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 300 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 300 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Erotic politicians, that's what we are. We're interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos and activity that appears to have no meaning." Jim Morrison |