Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 03:16:44
Server time: 00:43:15, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of June 4118

Details

Submitted by[?]: Graasruuts

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4119

Description[?]:

The Graasruuts propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Socialist People's Republic of Beluzia.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:49:35, November 10, 2016 CET
FromUnited Social Technocratic Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 4118
MessageThis budget looks good to the UST.

Date21:49:59, November 10, 2016 CET
FromGraasruuts
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 4118
MessagePlease see our new spending bill, with an additional 8,000,000,000 committed towards Science and Technology

Date22:01:14, November 10, 2016 CET
FromLibertarians of Beluzia
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 4118
MessageDoubling the assigned budget of a sector simply on the prospect of having unspent funds on our budget is insane. I would support a marginal increase in spending if it was offset by a reduction in spending.

Date22:37:04, November 10, 2016 CET
FromGraasruuts
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 4118
MessageWe still have a surplus, we're just using some of it to continue developing nd avoid stagnation as well as compete internationally.
MPB, I thought you supported the notion?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 300

no
   

Total Seats: 300

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "Erotic politicians, that's what we are. We're interested in anything about revolt, disorder, chaos and activity that appears to have no meaning." Jim Morrison

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 53