We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Power to the Head of State
Details
Submitted by[?]: Ny Alternativ Revolusjonær
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2181
Description[?]:
| We feel this is better as it will make elections for the HoS more strategic and focused. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The appointment of mayors.
Old value:: The municipal councils exercise mayoral powers.
Current: Mayors are elected by their municipal councils.
Proposed: The Head of State oversees the appointment of all mayors.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:36:07, February 02, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | We are against a presidential republic, better a strong divisions of power. Also, the mayor system should not be what you propose. |
| Date | 18:54:55, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Northern Light | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | Hmm...this isnt so bad...We think we can approve |
| Date | 20:02:37, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Ny Alternativ Revolusjonær | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | Thanks for your support NL. I shall put it to vote after the election because there are so many inactive parties. |
| Date | 20:07:07, February 02, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | OOC: please, think about this: if the HoS and HoG are divided, more strategic option must be adopted ingame. In this way, the HoS elections takes care about endorsments in order to be in the cabinet. It would be cool |
| Date | 20:32:24, February 02, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | ooc: Why did you make that comment ooc? Surely it should have been IC? |
| Date | 22:01:18, February 02, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | OOC: no, since it is about the game mechanics and not on the IC parties. |
| Date | 01:20:09, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | But thats irrelevent, because the game mechanics is very similiar to a constitution, for example. |
| Date | 05:33:06, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Black Magic | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | Power to the People! |
| Date | 09:14:17, February 03, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | OOC: No, it is not irrilevant. If I want to insult you for your position, I will be IC. If I want to talk with you as person, I will be OOC. In this case, I had explained why I think that divided power is better only on a strategic POV in the game. |
| Date | 12:28:11, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | Talking about the 'game' is explicity IC |
| Date | 12:46:45, February 03, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | OOC: no, since I don't think that IC I'm a fictional party created by an internet user who like to have political power on a fictional country. :) |
| Date | 13:14:36, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Konservativ Monarkistpartiet | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | Look, you explicity gave a reason for keeping the HoG and the HoS seperate, that is IC. |
| Date | 16:31:17, February 03, 2006 CET | From | KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | OOC: If you want this, ok! :p |
| Date | 04:59:28, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Ny Alternativ Revolusjonær | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | Originally the debate is suppose to be on the HoS & HoG, not IC or OOC... But it was an interesting debate none the less. |
| Date | 07:55:11, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Black Magic | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | Our polls indicate that increasing concentration of power will NOT bring the increased stability it purports. |
| Date | 07:48:33, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Ny Alternativ Revolusjonær | To | Debating the Power to the Head of State |
| Message | Your polls are rigged. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 112 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 89 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When elections in a country are held, all bills in the voting phase are reset to the debate phase. |
| Random quote: âTell these old, grey men that their time is over. Tell them to give us back our future, and then get lost!â - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician |