Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5477
Next month in: 00:13:36
Server time: 11:46:23, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanEge | GLNBei | LC73DunMHP | MyungJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Educational Advancement Act, 4119

Details

Submitted by[?]: Technoliberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 4120

Description[?]:

Our education system needs rapid increases in funding and decentralization in order to increase the quality of education in Gaduridos.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:09:45, November 12, 2016 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageThere are some articles that we agree with. Unfortunately, we can't vote in favor of the whole bill

Date14:20:48, November 12, 2016 CET
FromTechnoliberal Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageGaduridos Communist Party,

What articles do you disagree with?

Technoliberal Minister of Education and Culture, Mose Feldman

Date14:22:53, November 12, 2016 CET
FromTechnoliberal Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageOOC: *Which (not "Want")

Date15:29:27, November 12, 2016 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageArticle 1: we think allowing private schools to deviate from the national curriculum could lead to different standards of education. A nationwide curriculum is the best way to guarantee good quality in education to everyone;
Article 2: private institutions that perform public services, may they be hospitals or schools, should always be heavily regulated;
Article 3: despite understanding the "case-by-case" analisys in order to ensure all students receive education, we think it should be the state to make sure that happens. And that can't happen by fueling the profit-driven private institutions;
Article 5: we would certainly allow private higher education to exist, but never with self-regulation. A national standard must be in place;
Article 9: Again, funding private institutions to run public services is a mistake

Hopefully we will come to an understanding, as you put forward some good proposals.

Date16:15:35, November 12, 2016 CET
FromTechnoliberal Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageGaduridos Communist Party,

We've modified Article 1 to only give a partial exception to private schools from the national curriculum, while removing Articles 2, 3, 5, and 9.

Now concerning Article 1, we did not completely remove it as private schools should be able to explore new ideas regarding education which could possibly be adapted into the national curriculum if they prove to be better than what state schools currently have, improving the quality of education for all. We hope for your endorsement of this bill now after modifying it to better suit your concerns.

Technoliberal Minister of Education and Culture, Mose Feldman

Date16:47:00, November 12, 2016 CET
FromGaduridos Communist Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageWe will vote in favor.

Date19:22:58, November 12, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageThe only proposal we could get behind is Article 1, we disagree with the rest.

Date21:52:46, November 12, 2016 CET
FromTechnoliberal Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageClassical Liberal Party,

Would you support our bill if we reintroduce a few articles, possibly in a modified form, that would allow and subsidize private educational institutions? If you're wondering, we got rid of a few articles regarding this subject in order to suit some of the concerns of the Gaduriodos Communist Party.

Technoliberal Minister of Education and Culture, Mose Feldman

Date03:39:21, November 13, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageWe will let you know once you propose the modified bill, but it does sound like something we could get behind.

Date04:08:21, November 13, 2016 CET
FromTechnoliberal Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageOOC: Unfortunately, the time has run out for modifications of the bill, and the bill will now go into voting in Congress. Too bad for you, Classical Liberal Party.

Date08:29:12, November 13, 2016 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Educational Advancement Act, 4119
MessageIt just means this bill won't pass.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 64

no
 

Total Seats: 68

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

    Random quote: "All this concern with the effects of global warming is another manifestation of being politically correct." - David Young

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 79