Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5481
Next month in: 01:29:12
Server time: 06:30:47, May 10, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ADM Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the United Countries

Details

Submitted by[?]: KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2180

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the United Countries. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:46:08, February 02, 2006 CET
From Konservativ Monarkistpartiet
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageThanks for the debating time. We really enjoyed reading the SL's reasoning behind their support for this treaty.

Date19:46:52, February 02, 2006 CET
From KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageOOC: since it could be taken "as is", debate is useless.

Date19:57:45, February 02, 2006 CET
From Konservativ Monarkistpartiet
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageNo debate is not useless, you don't have any idea who supports this, you have have given no reasons to vote yes, you don't even explain what benefits this bills brings.

Date19:59:23, February 02, 2006 CET
From KSP - Kazulia Socialdemokratisk Parti
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageIf you are able to read the bill, why not read it?

Date20:25:39, February 02, 2006 CET
From Konservativ Monarkistpartiet
ToDebating the Ratification of the United Countries
MessageBecause that is not providing an argument in favour of the bill is it? That is not allowing debate on the bill is it? That does not explain why you think we should have it, does it?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 34

no
   

Total Seats: 33

abstain
   

Total Seats: 33


Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242

Random quote: "In politics, stupidity is not a handicap." - Napoleon Bonaparte

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 46