We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to privacy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hobrazia Libertarain Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4122
Description[?]:
| An act which is protects the right to privacy by closing off Government access to records. This prevents hackers and other malicious people from accessing it, and government surveillance/access to private information has a miniscule impact on crime fighting |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Proposed: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:36:57, November 17, 2016 CET | From |  Partia Robotnicza Hobrazia | To | Debating the Right to privacy |
| Message | You need proposals. |
| Date | 18:17:06, November 17, 2016 CET | From | Hobrazia Libertarain Party | To | Debating the Right to privacy |
| Message | Sorry, I'm new, what do you mean I need proposals? |
| Date | 22:21:06, November 17, 2016 CET | From | Hobrazia Libertarain Party | To | Debating the Right to privacy |
| Message | Got it |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 62 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 68 |
| Random fact: Culturally Open nations can adopt advisory/non-enforceable Nation Descriptions. See http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6242 |
| Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |