We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Tukarali Security Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rightist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2182
Description[?]:
| This act will allow us to defend ourselves from those that want to harm us internally. This will help defend our children and children's children. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is not inviolable.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Proposed: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:11:31, February 03, 2006 CET | From | DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | 'We agree. The rights of the individual are only secure when the state can protect them sufficiently. This is what this bill proposes to do. Bravo, Rightist Party!' - Archbishop DaVida |
| Date | 14:25:21, February 03, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | In the spirit of compromse we could support 2&3 but most certainly not 1. |
| Date | 14:51:26, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | Why not ONCP? |
| Date | 20:26:28, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Patriot Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | We shall support all 3 articles. This will assist our intelligence and police forces catch anyone who wants to harm our nation. |
| Date | 22:13:56, February 03, 2006 CET | From | Social-Conservative party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | We strongly support this great measure. Strenght and security! |
| Date | 02:26:30, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 15:49:38, February 04, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Socialist Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | civil rights. I believe in them. |
| Date | 17:20:16, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | We'll take your recommendation under advisement. |
| Date | 21:24:58, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Rightist Party | To | Debating the Tukarali Security Act |
| Message | We have decided to remove Article 1 in the spirit of compromise to help ensure passage of this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 214 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 52 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 33 |
| Random fact: When forming a cabinet, try to include as few parties as possible, while still obtaining a majority of the seats. |
| Random quote: "Man is by nature a political animal." - Aristotle |