We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Forest Management Act

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Rightist Party

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2186

Description^[?]:

This will take it out of our hands and gives it back to the local governments.

Proposals

Article 1

Proposal^[?] to change Forest management.

Old value:: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.

Current: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.

Proposed: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	14:32:54, February 03, 2006 CET
From	One Nation Socialist Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	opposed. Centralisation is the Government set up that under the current circumstances will help us move further.

Date	15:01:18, February 03, 2006 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	No it wont. All it does is create beuracracy and the redtape that goes with it. It PREVENTS progress because of it.

Date	16:29:50, February 03, 2006 CET
From	One Nation Socialist Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	yes but that is much further down the line of progress. First we need to build as one unit and operate efficioently. Then we the red tape won't be needed.

Date	19:14:56, February 03, 2006 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	Red tape will always get in the way no matter how far we progress. Actually, there will be more of it as we progress. If you knew anything about government, you would know this.

Date	20:39:02, February 03, 2006 CET
From	Patriot Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	We shall support this measure.

Date	21:54:47, February 03, 2006 CET
From	Social-Conservative party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	WE OPPOSE, centralisation is desirable.

Date	02:23:08, February 04, 2006 CET
From	Redneck Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	Supported

Date	13:47:37, February 04, 2006 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	Even though with centralization there is red tape SCP?

Date	16:12:51, February 07, 2006 CET
From	Social-Conservative party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	Red Tape is fun - Sir Humphrey Appleby

Date	05:15:39, February 08, 2006 CET
From	Patriot Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	Red tape holds up progress.

Date	13:42:00, February 09, 2006 CET
From	One Nation Socialist Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	"sometimes red tape enables progress by pointing it in the right direction."-David Clarke, Tribal Chancellor.

Date	15:31:39, February 09, 2006 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	Uh.... red tape is never puts things in the right direction.

Date	16:19:41, February 10, 2006 CET
From	Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	The Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialist Party declares its support to this bill.

Date	15:43:15, February 16, 2006 CET
From	Rightist Party
To	Debating the Forest Management Act
Message	does a victory dance

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Freedom Party (58)
Patriot Party (51)
Rightist Party (41)
DaVidan Theological Monarchist Party (39)
Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists (0)

Total Seats: 189

One Nation Socialist Party (74)
Social-Conservative party (36)

Total Seats: 110

abstain

3wide.com Antiparticulates (0)
KentuckyFriedPanda Party (0)

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information.

Random quote: "I think the environment should be put in the category of our national security. Defense of our resources is just as important as defense abroad. Otherwise, what is there to defend?" - Robert Redford

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 80