We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Clothign Liberalization Act 4124
Details
Submitted by[?]: Fortschrittsvereinigung
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 4125
Description[?]:
We believe the current law is highly restrictive and goes against freedom of expression. This must be instantly repealed! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:58:45, November 23, 2016 CET | From | Dorvische Sozial Nationale Volkspartei | To | Debating the Religious Clothign Liberalization Act 4124 |
Message | Mr Speaker, Why would we allow this? Wearing religious clothing is a right that should be respected yes. But public officials have a duty to serve all citizens and need to wear proper clothes. We vote against. Bryan von Braum, DKF Chairman |
Date | 15:04:23, November 23, 2016 CET | From | Fortschrittsvereinigung | To | Debating the Religious Clothign Liberalization Act 4124 |
Message | Mr von Braum, They can still serve all citizens dressed in their religious attire. Some religions mandate that the followers of that religion are required to wear certain garments of clothing, not wearing it goes against that religion, for example an Ahmadi not wearing their headwear goes against their religion. Most would rather quit their job as a public official than go against their religion this way, as such this keeps people of that religion effectively locked out of such a profession. Officials wearing religions garments causes no problems, why must the DKF keep on with this witch hunt regarding religion? Meik Brandt, Parliamentary Leader of the Opposition |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 210 | ||
no | Total Seats: 275 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election. |
Random quote: "Entrepreneurs are simply those who understand that there is little difference between obstacle and opportunity and are able to turn both to their advantage." - Niccolo Machiavelli |