Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:40:00
Server time: 04:19:59, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Justice bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Traditionelle Völker Partei für Dorvik

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4133

Description[?]:

A bill to change our justice system.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:22:41, December 05, 2016 CET
FromFortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Justice bill
MessageMr Speaker,

This bill is far too dangerous, storing every citizens DNA, police patrolling all property at all time, legalizing caning and flogging. We cannot allow such an abuse of basic rights to pass!

Felix Hoehmann, State Chancellor of the Dorvish Republic

Date01:36:19, December 05, 2016 CET
FromKonservative Union
ToDebating the Justice bill
MessageMr. Speaker,

Article 1. - Violation of Privacy,
Article 2. - Violation of Privacy,
Article 3. - Inhumane,

Iohannis Libermann, DSU justice spokesman.

Date01:45:25, December 05, 2016 CET
FromTraditionelle Völker Partei für Dorvik
ToDebating the Justice bill
MessageMr speaker,
Article three ensures that the police can do their crime fighting job.
Article two is an effective deterrent andounishment.
Article one ensures we can catch all criminals.

Date08:16:38, December 05, 2016 CET
FromSozialistische Zukunftspartei
ToDebating the Justice bill
MessageThis is precisely the kind of Rightist-Dorvisch thought the Westmarkisch Linke Separatisten wish to spare the Westmarkisch people from.

We are implacably opposed.

Date10:51:28, December 05, 2016 CET
FromLibertären Partei
ToDebating the Justice bill
MessageMr. speaker,

Why would we legalize caning or flogging? That would destroy the rehabilitation of criminals and increase the crime rate.
And we want to leave police presence to local government because while neighborhoods with a high crime rate can benefit from police presence, neighborhoods with a low crime rate have no benefit from police presence.

And a message to the westmarkisch Linke separatisten:
Stop blaming dorvik for westmarkisch problems.

Arend Beyer,
Chairman of the freiheit partei.

Date18:12:44, December 05, 2016 CET
FromTraditionelle Völker Partei für Dorvik
ToDebating the Justice bill
MessageMr speaker,
Caning and flogging will quite literally beat the sense into people who dare to harm society and Dorvik's citizens. Of course flogging will only be given as a punishment for more severe crime.

Date22:20:30, December 05, 2016 CET
FromKonservative Union
ToDebating the Justice bill
MessageMr. Speker,

Article 3. would ensure nothing more than police and other public safety authorities right to abuse suspects bu corporal punishments. NOTHING MORE. Since Death Penalty is one of punishments in our country we see no valid reason to allow for torture.

Article 2. is nothing more than violation of private property, entrance withour a warrant is nothing more like tresspassing private property.

Article 1. is nothing more than violation of privacy and collecting DNA from citizens who are not under criminal investigation and that is unacceptable.

Aaron Posse.

Date21:29:07, December 08, 2016 CET
FromTraditionelle Völker Partei für Dorvik
ToDebating the Justice bill
MessageMr speaker,
Maybe mr Posse would like to have a good look at article 2. Article 2 clearly states the police can patrol PUBLIC property at all times. So this isn't buissnesses this isn't people's homes or property. This is public property, places owned by the government, like streets and railway stations.
TheDSU are scaremongering and they're antagonising people's safety, seriously look at the facts. For a search on private property a warrant would have to still be obtained. Article 1 ensures the government knows everyone's DNA so that if a new criminal kills someone, but hasn't in the past. They can be tracked! However we would reach a dilemma if we searched everyone who had previously committed crime.
Thank you.

Derek Westmark,
MP

Date21:35:19, December 08, 2016 CET
FromKonservative Union
ToDebating the Justice bill
MessageMr. Westmark,

I am sorry for misreading that article but it does not changes our stance toward other articles.

Aaron Posse, Staatskanzler der Dorvisch Republik

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 9

no
      

Total Seats: 347

abstain
 

Total Seats: 144


Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval.

Random quote: "Apparently, a democracy is a place where numerous elections are held at great cost without issues and with interchangeable candidates." - Gore Vidal

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 80