We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Rutanian-Alorian Treaty [Draft]
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical Freedom Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2183
Description[?]:
| http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewtreaty.php?treatyid=198 The Foreign Ministry submits this for the approval of the Federated Parliament. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:47:32, February 04, 2006 CET | From |  RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Rutanian-Alorian Treaty [Draft] |
| Message | We oppose. |
| Date | 16:03:56, February 04, 2006 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Rutanian-Alorian Treaty [Draft] |
| Message | Why on earth would you oppose a decent treaty of cooperation and friendship? |
| Date | 13:48:34, February 05, 2006 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Rutanian-Alorian Treaty [Draft] |
| Message | Because of the universal nature of article 4. In times of emergency, we must reserve the right to intensify our border security. |
| Date | 14:45:00, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Rutanian-Alorian Treaty [Draft] |
| Message | Article 2 needs to not allow barriers to foreign investment |
| Date | 17:24:10, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Radical Freedom Party | To | Debating the Rutanian-Alorian Treaty [Draft] |
| Message | Hmmm. I agree with the FP that this would be a good thing, but the treaty is quite clear about the limited nature of such things. To demand this change might erode the support of other parties. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 171 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 239 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 189 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: The Wolfsheim Virus is not a real actual disease in the conventional medical sense of the term. Rather, it is a cluster of symptoms which are just part of the general socio-economic disease that is capitalism. The main symptoms the sufferers are experiencing are a direct result of capitalist poverty, as in malnutrition, poor housing and so on, combined with psycho-somatic symptoms which are a direct consequence of the contradictions and stresses which are inherent to the capitalist system. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |