We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Weaponry Limitation and Safety Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Free Market Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4134
Description[?]:
| This bill would preserve the right to have nuclear weapons while decreasing the risk of nuclear armageddon. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons if victory is not feasibile by other means.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:31:25, December 12, 2016 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Liberal | To | Debating the Nuclear Weaponry Limitation and Safety Act |
| Message | Define feasible by other means? That's very broad. Therefore I'm going to have to vote no |
| Date | 13:32:04, December 12, 2016 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Nuclear Weaponry Limitation and Safety Act |
| Message | Agreed the terminology is too nebulous. If the unspeakable time came when we would need to consider using nuclear weapons, we need to be absolute sure of our operational and strategic parameters. Ralph Mason, Minority Speaker of the House |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 331 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 369 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes." - Winston Churchill |