We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Blue Dawn Agenda (i)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mouvement des Conservateurs
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2181
Description[?]:
Presenting to the National Assembly, the political agenda of the Blue Party. Regards, Keith Holmes Candidate for the Office of the Chairman. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: All power stations are publicly owned.
Current: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Proposed: Private power stations provide energy for the entire power grid.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on the nation's power grid.
Old value:: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Current: The national grid is fully owned by the state.
Proposed: Multiple private companies each own and maintain sections of the national power grid.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Radio stations.
Old value:: The government subsidises a national radio station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Current: The government subsidises a national radio station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised radio stations are allowed.
Proposed: All radio stations are private.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Television stations.
Old value:: The government subsidises a national TV station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Current: The government subsidises a national TV station for educational and informational purposes; other private non-subsidised TV stations are allowed.
Proposed: All television media are private.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Current: The government subsidizes private enterprises that face bankruptcy.
Proposed: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the pension system.
Old value:: The state operates a compulsory public system combined with an optional private pension.
Current: There is a compulsory private pension system.
Proposed: There is a compulsory private pension system.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Current: The government subsidises the cost of pharmaceutical drugs for people on low incomes.
Proposed: The government subsidises the cost of pharmaceutical drugs for people on low incomes.
Article 8
Proposal[?] to change Funding of public transport (where applicable).
Old value:: Public transport is fully subsidised by the government.
Current: Public transport is fully subsidised for people with low-income, with the remainder "user-pays".
Proposed: Public transport is fully subsidised for people with low-income, with the remainder "user-pays".
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:19:45, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Lutte Féministe de Libération | To | Debating the Blue Dawn Agenda (i) |
Message | Certainly we are opposed to such an omnibus proposal that would spell destruction to the Rildanorian way of life we so cherish. |
Date | 10:04:22, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Blue Dawn Agenda (i) |
Message | Too extreme of a bill for me too. And you are not "the" blue party. You are one out of three blue parties in Rildanor, 23CC. |
Date | 19:54:12, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Blue Dawn Agenda (i) |
Message | Great argument to oppose this bill... |
Date | 20:21:07, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Blue Dawn Agenda (i) |
Message | What? The bill has articles that we do not support, that are too extreme. And the LPP does not support articles either. You've got eight articles, what do you want? That we argue and argument all eight of em? You would have been better served to propose them seperatly then. |
Date | 21:32:36, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Blue Dawn Agenda (i) |
Message | It will save the government some money. |
Date | 23:26:17, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Blue Dawn Agenda (i) |
Message | I don't want anything DEP, you were the one who gave an argument. |
Date | 10:51:56, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Blue Dawn Agenda (i) |
Message | Then why did you gave that comment "Great argument to oppose this bill..."? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 189 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 264 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 47 |
Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum! |
Random quote: “Can anyone imagine a more perverse idea than forcing faithful Hosians like me to give away my money to enable irresponsible teenage girls to kill off their children because they were too drunk to use a damn condom?" - Dr. Francesca dos Santos, former Dranian politician |