We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Forest management.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Workers´ Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4141
Description[?]:
| Dear colleagues, I sincerely believe that the management of our forests should fit the government, only this. We have a law that says: "Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks." and commercial forestry companies working alongside a national agency hurts our law. There is a conflict of interests between the Forest Management Law and the Forest Protection Law that can be remedied with the approval of this law. Sincerely, Afonso Goulart - Workers´ Party |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Current: There is a national agency which exists side-by-side with commercial forestry companies.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribeVoting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 221 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 230 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: The U.N. is a place where governments opposed to free speech demand to be heard. - MAD Magazine |