We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Reform Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sojuz Ljudej (People's Union)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2181
Description[?]:
| Reducing Governmental Power for Eminent Domain |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for any reason.
Current: The policy regarding eminent domain is left to local governments.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:31:52, February 05, 2006 CET | From |  Tirgith Populus Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Reform Bill |
| Message | We'd Support, and even go one step less. |
| Date | 19:00:20, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Reform Bill |
| Message | We oppose |
| Date | 19:02:01, February 05, 2006 CET | From | Liberty Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Reform Bill |
| Message | Whoops, I misread what the current situation is. I guess we support, although realistically - since the government would be able to arbitrarily determine what is 'vital', the proposed change is barely any different than we currently have. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 248 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 65 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 242 |
| Random fact: Google Translate can help you with those language translations: https://translate.google.com/ |
| Random quote: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle |