Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 02:27:02
Server time: 13:32:57, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Promotion of Culture Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Georgeonian Centrist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2183

Description[?]:

Let us join together in encouraging the education and cultural fulfilment of our citizens by establishing a series of national museums, and by encouraging local governments to build and maintain high quality libraries.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:51:19, February 06, 2006 CET
From Pontesi Fascist Coalition
ToDebating the Promotion of Culture Act
MessageHow 'bout protecting Pontesi from foul, corrupting overseas influences like foreign missionaries?

Date09:53:59, February 06, 2006 CET
From Georgeonian Centrist Party
ToDebating the Promotion of Culture Act
MessageWhat does that have to do with this bill?

Date14:32:27, February 06, 2006 CET
From Pnték Znkak Prta 'Bastardry'
ToDebating the Promotion of Culture Act
MessageI think the PFC is arguing that the influence of foreign missionaries in changing the opinions of native Pontesians is a threat to the culture of Pontesi, in their opinion at least; we feel that perhaps local governments should have control of any museum system without central assistance at all- then those who see them as beneficial will invest in them accordingly and those who don't won't be mandated to when they won't be visited by as many. This would probably a better balance of economic and cultural interests.

Date15:58:23, February 06, 2006 CET
From Georgeonian Centrist Party
ToDebating the Promotion of Culture Act
MessageIf Article 2 were changed from national government to local governments would more people be willing to support this bill?

Date19:34:44, February 06, 2006 CET
From Friedrich Hayek Party
ToDebating the Promotion of Culture Act
MessageWe do not see the need for government at all, what is wrong with private institutions preserving our culture instead of government, if government does it, it will be biased in favour of government

Date18:14:23, February 07, 2006 CET
From Pnték Znkak Prta 'Bastardry'
ToDebating the Promotion of Culture Act
MessageOnly if the party in power in corrupt, FHP. I hope this isn't a confession ;)

GCP - The CBP would certainly support it if the decision was brought down to local governments.

Date20:19:18, February 07, 2006 CET
From Pontesi Fascist Coalition
ToDebating the Promotion of Culture Act
MessageUltimately, we feel it is in the PFC's interest to preserve the great heritage of Pontesi, and will therefore support this bill.

Date23:32:45, February 07, 2006 CET
From Georgeonian Centrist Party
ToDebating the Promotion of Culture Act
MessageAltered to leave museums and libraries to local government and submitted to vote.

Date00:10:01, February 08, 2006 CET
From Friedrich Hayek Party
ToDebating the Promotion of Culture Act
MessageIt cant be a confession, we do not seek to control the education of the public, thus we cant be corrupt ;-)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 100

no
  

Total Seats: 117

abstain
  

Total Seats: 54


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "Democracy is in peril." - Ralph Nader (referring to turnout in the 1996 US presidential election)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70