We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: No Pornography for Luthori
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2184
Description[?]:
| Our Holy Empire should not tolerate the stain of pornography. The Conservative Party wants to initiate a new Christian Morality Act by prohibiting every form of pornography. Our bodies to us weren't given to us by the Lord in order to expose them publicly! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal and prosecuted as a civil offence.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding sexually explicit material on broadcast television.
Old value:: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Current: Sexually explicit material is not allowed, but nudity that is not sexually explicit is.
Proposed: Nudity on television is banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:44:46, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the No Pornography for Luthori |
| Message | No. The human body is a masterpiece of creation; it can be sharpened and hardened into a weapon of total destruction. So why hide it? I am not advocating that people walk around nude everywhere (we are perfectly fine with what we already have), but I am saying that thinking that our bodies are shameful is stupid. |
| Date | 05:26:48, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the No Pornography for Luthori |
| Message | Wasn't Adam and Eve naked until they ate the fruit of knowledge of good and evil. |
| Date | 05:27:31, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the No Pornography for Luthori |
| Message | ie God intended us to be naked, and thus clothing is against God's will. |
| Date | 11:11:26, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the No Pornography for Luthori |
| Message | God did not intend us to be naked. We have the knowledge of good and evil and also - more important - we have the capacity to do good and evil as we choose. Being naked, in most cases, bend us on doing evil. So the issue isn't that our bodies were God-given, the issue is about the way we use them. Nudity, while not bad in itself (even St. Francisc of Assisi was said to havin held a sermon naked), can have dangerous repercussions on our community. The Lord wanted us to go naked only in the Garden of Eden, when we were unable to do evil - and there was no public, only Adam and Eve. |
| Date | 11:34:57, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the No Pornography for Luthori |
| Message | If someone can't look at a naked human body without instictively thinking about sex, then they should be sent to a re-education facility, rather than covering up everyone else. |
| Date | 11:49:03, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the No Pornography for Luthori |
| Message | You can not assume that people will only think pure thoughts. Experience shows us that usually people think about sex almost all the time and that seeing a naked body makes them do evil things. it's easier to prevent than to punish them after they have done evil. |
| Date | 12:23:57, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the No Pornography for Luthori |
| Message | Who said anything about punishment? People should just learn some self control. |
| Date | 19:26:14, February 07, 2006 CET | From | Shuggoth Progressive Party | To | Debating the No Pornography for Luthori |
| Message | Am I the only one wondering why this bill has nothing to do with banning pornography? |
| Date | 19:44:04, February 07, 2006 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the No Pornography for Luthori |
| Message | You have the full support of the RnP on this bill. Although, it could, and should go much farther. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 55 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 328 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 262 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
| Random quote: "War crimes is such a lilliputian term for the atrocities committed by the Yeudish state." - Katrine Lorenzen, former Kazulian diplomat |