We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: OOC: Party Proposals Left in Debate

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Classical Liberal Party

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 4207

Description^[?]:

How about instead of churning out party proposals that everyone has to vote on, each party, at the beginning of each new term, drafts a bill with all of their party's positions, but leaves it in debate stage. This way, we can all see which pieces of law each party wants to change, and make forming coalitions for bills easier, and foster greater communication and cooperation between the parties. Then, at the end of each term, the parties delete their proposal bills and draft fresh ones for the next term. Let me know down below if you have any thoughts, questions, or suggestions.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	04:39:57, January 11, 2017 CET
From	Classical Liberal Party
To	Debating the OOC: Party Proposals Left in Debate
Message	It would have to be a non-partisan agreement that parties are not to advance their party platforms to the voting stage, and for appropriate punishment to be doled out to repeat offenders.

Date	06:05:19, January 11, 2017 CET
From	NLP
To	Debating the OOC: Party Proposals Left in Debate
Message	We would support this, with minor changes - instead of having to draft up a new party platform every term, it may be better to have a changing party platform permanently in the debate stage - this is as these platforms are very long, and would use ~1 year's worth of proposals.

Date	06:22:31, January 11, 2017 CET
From	Federal Democratic Party
To	Debating the OOC: Party Proposals Left in Debate
Message	We would be ok with this.

Date	06:32:01, January 11, 2017 CET
From	Federal Democratic Party
To	Debating the OOC: Party Proposals Left in Debate
Message	Or, rather, we would support this with the modifications mentioned by NLP.

Date	16:35:21, January 11, 2017 CET
From	Radical Democratic Party
To	Debating the OOC: Party Proposals Left in Debate
Message	We are against those huge bills full of proposals by the CLP that we have to vote in one time. Apart from that, we are fine with this.

Date	16:39:23, January 11, 2017 CET
From	Classical Liberal Party
To	Debating the OOC: Party Proposals Left in Debate
Message	Yes I understand the problems of submitting the huge bills to have everyone vote on. And I really like the NLP's suggestion. If it is okay with everyone, we can start these platforms right after the upcoming January 4150 elections.

Date	17:02:31, January 11, 2017 CET
From	Radical Democratic Party
To	Debating the OOC: Party Proposals Left in Debate
Message	We are against those huge bills full of proposals by the CLP that we have to vote in one time. Apart from that, we are fine with this.

Date	11:06:30, May 07, 2017 CET
From	Moderation
To	Debating the OOC: Party Proposals Left in Debate
Message	OOC:Archiving

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 344

Hosian Civic Union (57)
National Socialist Workers party (39)

Total Seats: 96

abstain

Radical Democratic Party (61)
iggyguzman Party (0)

Total Seats: 61

Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law.

Random quote: "Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64