We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Unneeded data.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Devout Ecologists Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2182
Description[?]:
| We have no enemies, we have no problems with other nations, so I do not see a reason to go on with intelligence on them. It is a waste of money and time. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.
Old value:: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Current: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Proposed: The nation maintains no intelligence agency.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:36:36, February 06, 2006 CET | From |  Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Unneeded data. |
| Message | We oppose because this is a abolition of an important security system to protect our citizens from external threats. |
| Date | 18:20:25, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Unneeded data. |
| Message | If there were external threats. Give us undeniable, solid and visible proof that there are any. |
| Date | 19:15:36, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Unneeded data. |
| Message | Give us undeniable, solid and visible proof that there AREN'T any. You're basing you assumption on the fact that we do not have a lot of role playing when it comes to how we deal with other nations. Just because the threat isn't obvious doesn't mean it isn't there. |
| Date | 19:15:43, February 06, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Unneeded data. |
| Message | Give us undeniable, solid and visible proof that there AREN'T any. You're basing you assumption on the fact that we do not have a lot of role playing when it comes to how we deal with other nations. Just because the threat isn't obvious doesn't mean it isn't there. |
| Date | 02:51:19, February 07, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Unneeded data. |
| Message | DEP, the problem with this sort of regulation and your statement to ratify it, is that it has the philosophy of "dealing with problems when they become actual problems". Well it could be to late then, so I'm in favour of "better to prevent then to solve". |
| Date | 19:01:26, February 07, 2006 CET | From | Devout Ecologists Party | To | Debating the Unneeded data. |
| Message | Well, the proof to show there aren't any is not visible RWE. Because if there are no threats, none can be visible. The NCC makes a better point, though I still think it's a waste of money, time and effort. We should show trust to the other nations, not spy them. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 171 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 282 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 47 |
| Random fact: Players should not role-play characters without the consent of the owner, and if they find they have role-played the character beyond what the owner intended, they should withdraw or amend the role-play appropriately. |
| Random quote: "When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I'm beginning to believe it." - Clarence Darrow |