We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Interviews with party leaders
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Democratic Party - Syndicalists
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4157
Description[?]:
| Each party leader gives a interview on their party policy their life and other things |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:47:54, January 25, 2017 CET | From | United Democratic Party - Syndicalists | To | Debating the Interviews with party leaders |
| Message | I thought this bill might be a good Rp idea so we can see what all the parties and their leaders are about |
| Date | 20:40:55, January 25, 2017 CET | From | Patriotic Party of Baltusia | To | Debating the Interviews with party leaders |
| Message | Ooc: you set the tone RAC and we'll follow. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 700 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "I have no faith in political arithmetic." - Adam Smith |