Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5476
Next month in: 02:14:43
Server time: 17:45:16, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): aai14 | hexaus18 | R Drax | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Coalition to remove the Commonwealth Workers Army(CWA) from Power.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likatonia People's Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.

Voting deadline: November 4157

Description[?]:

The CWA has been changing the laws of the land to infringe on the rights of the Citizens of Likatonia and as a party we don't think that they are the rightful party to be in control of the country's most powerful office. Thus, we call upon all parties to endorse the candidate of the Nation's second largest party, the People's Democratic Party to remove this rogue and demigogic leadership.

Jamie Chinx
LPP National Executive Council Vice President.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:29:18, January 27, 2017 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Coalition to remove the Commonwealth Workers Army(CWA) from Power.
MessageThe CWA finds this an odd and undemocratic bill.

The Commonwealth Workers Army has been entirely transparent about every agenda item - it is not our fault that the people of Likatonia prefer to vote for our agenda.

We do not object to every party choosing to endorse any candidate they choose to endorse - it IS, after all, entirely their right to choose.

On the other hand - if parties want to create a voting-bloc to endorse one candidate - shouldn't we have some sort of democratic run-off, rather than just arbitrarily handing executive power to the losing candidate in the Second Round of elections?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 348

no
 

Total Seats: 206

abstain
  

Total Seats: 196


Random fact: Discuss flag designs at the Flag Designs thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=37

Random quote: "I am thankful for the taxes I pay because it means that I'm employed." - Nancie J. Carmody

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37