Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 01:17:41
Server time: 02:42:18, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Animal Rights Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Renew

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4159

Description[?]:

It's time we get rid if this immortal, medically dangerous and abuse to animals.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:20:54, January 29, 2017 CET
FromFederal Democratic Party
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act
MessageWe would fully support.

Date08:12:16, January 29, 2017 CET
FromNLP
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act
MessageWe would oppose, as this extends government power. However, we would not oppose a measure to localize bestiality laws (by state)

Date18:01:16, January 29, 2017 CET
FromConservative Renew
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act
Messagewhile we do accept that this measure does extend federal government power, isn't it the job to protect the people? because of this law we've seen terrible STDs ravage across this nation creating a Public Health crisis.

Date20:33:17, January 29, 2017 CET
FromNLP
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act
MessageAny bestiality ban would be very ineffective, as sexual intercourse is not, and has never been, something that can be effectively regulated. We believe that it would be better for the citizen to be able to conduct such activity openly, with access to government resources as to how to avoid STDs, rather than do it secretly, which would increase their risks.

However, we acknowledge that there are some portions of the country which such activity disproportionately affect, which may lead to a health crisis. As such, we are willing to compromise - localize these laws, and allow the local communities to dictate whether they believe a ban is necessary.

Date20:33:22, January 29, 2017 CET
FromNLP
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act
MessageAny bestiality ban would be very ineffective, as sexual intercourse is not, and has never been, something that can be effectively regulated. We believe that it would be better for the citizen to be able to conduct such activity openly, with access to government resources as to how to avoid STDs, rather than do it secretly, which would increase their risks.

However, we acknowledge that there are some portions of the country which such activity disproportionately affect, which may lead to a health crisis. As such, we are willing to compromise - localize these laws, and allow the local communities to dictate whether they believe a ban is necessary.

Date02:09:12, January 30, 2017 CET
FromConservative Renew
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act
MessageIf the Neo-liberals can give us one reason why or how bestiality benefits our nation or our people we would be willing to make such a compromise

Date09:34:22, January 30, 2017 CET
FromNLP
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act
MessageWhat we are saying is that while bestiality is not something we endorse, it would be better to have resources available to those who conduct the activity than to have them do it in secret.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 166

no
   

Total Seats: 337

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker).

Random quote: "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?" - Mahatma Gandhi.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58