We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ecology Reform Act II
Details
Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Independence Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 4166
Description[?]:
| It is time to end the unnecessary restrictions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: The government requires tree plantation at replacement level for all logging or clearance operations.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government does not intervene with regard to the replantation of trees.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Current: Forests are protected. Logging is allowed by licence only.
Proposed: The government promotes forest clearance.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: Waste disposal is left entirely to the private sector and is unregulated.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning private cars.
Old value:: Only cars using environmentally friendly fuels are allowed.
Current: Only one car allowed per household, people are encouraged to travel collective and tax incentives on cars using environmentally friendly fuels.
Proposed: There are no regulations on the ownership of private cars.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government-sponsored recycling programs.
Old value:: The government funds recycling facilities but enforces mandatory recycling for industry only.
Current: The government funds recycling facilities and enforces mandatory recycling for residents, commercial enterprise, and industry.
Proposed: There is no national policy regarding recycled garbage.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:55:12, February 14, 2017 CET | From | Progressive Secularists Party | To | Debating the Ecology Reform Act II |
| Message | CLIP and PSP agree on a lot of things. Religion, Civil Liberties, Economics and Military. But this is one thing we cannot be further apart from eachother. You people are clearly insane proposing this, how could you ever look to the current world and propose this kind of things. I have the feeling you only do this to be rebels and look though for the voters. I strongly advise the CLIP to reconsinder this bill and take care of our earth. Mekana Akiki President of the Confederation |
| Date | 14:55:20, February 14, 2017 CET | From | Progressive Secularists Party | To | Debating the Ecology Reform Act II |
| Message | CLIP and PSP agree on a lot of things. Religion, Civil Liberties, Economics and Military. But this is one thing we cannot be further apart from eachother. You people are clearly insane proposing this, how could you ever look to the current world and propose this kind of things. I have the feeling you only do this to be rebels and look though for the voters. I strongly advise the CLIP to reconsinder this bill and take care of our earth. Mekana Akiki President of the Confederation |
| Date | 14:57:31, February 14, 2017 CET | From | Classical Liberal Independence Party | To | Debating the Ecology Reform Act II |
| Message | We are deeply saddened our friend and former coalition partner is calling us insane, yet got angry when we accused you of anarchism. It appears the once decent PSP is radicalizing. Shame! -Cristina Matei |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 85 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 229 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 137 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |