We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Abortion Rights Act of 4168
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party of Sekowo (民主党)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 4169
Description[?]:
... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: All abortions are illegal.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Proposed: Abortion policies are established by local governments
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:59:52, February 18, 2017 CET | From | Jiyū Party of Sekouo (自由党) | To | Debating the Abortion Rights Act of 4168 |
Message | We will support this if article 2 is removed |
Date | 13:00:57, February 18, 2017 CET | From | Jiyū Party of Sekouo (自由党) | To | Debating the Abortion Rights Act of 4168 |
Message | The government shouldn't fund anything whether it be a business, organization, service, product, etc. they shouldn't be funded. |
Date | 02:20:05, February 19, 2017 CET | From | Jiyū Party of Sekouo (自由党) | To | Debating the Abortion Rights Act of 4168 |
Message | We would support this bill although many within our coalition would be unable with the decision |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 152 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 25 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "Socialists like to tout their confiscation and redistribution schemes as noble and caring, but we should ask if theft is ever noble or caring." - Robert Hawes |