We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Free Religion Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4170
Description[?]:
| We as legislative branch need to encourage free religion for our constituents, but our state religion remain neutral. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning religions.
Old value:: There is no government policy concerning a state religion.
Current: There is no official state religion, but the government only allows recognized religions. 'Cults' are persecuted.
Proposed: There is no official state religion, but the government requires everyone to belong to a religion of some kind.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:36:00, February 21, 2017 CET | From | 🐘Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Free Religion Act |
| Message | This is just done to get some participation points. Is this really a serious proposal? Absolutely oppose. |
| Date | 22:40:54, February 21, 2017 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Free Religion Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Atheism also include as a religion so people can believe whatever they like. And this is a serious proposal. |
| Date | 22:41:39, February 21, 2017 CET | From | United National Congress | To | Debating the Free Religion Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, A strange proposal. If the Democrats do indeed, as they put it, support "encouraging free religion" and say "our state religion should remain neutral", yet all this bill does is restrict religious freedom by mandating that everyone must belong to some form of religion! Outrageous, an attack of freedom of speech, thought and expression. We vigorously oppose. Sadiq Mandal, UNC Leader, Former President |
| Date | 22:44:36, February 21, 2017 CET | From | 🐘Liberal Democrats | To | Debating the Free Religion Act |
| Message | We would have to seriously oppose a mandate for a religion. Atheism is not a religion, not organized anyways as not all Atheists believe in a set of believes. |
| Date | 22:47:13, February 21, 2017 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Free Religion Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, As it will oppose the majority of the congress I will vote no to the proposal |
| Date | 22:59:37, February 21, 2017 CET | From |  Bazmuyut Pontesi | To | Debating the Free Religion Act |
| Message | Atheisme is not a religion and this is not a freedom of religion but force people into a religion. Jonathan Jadoul, Chairman of the MMP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 51 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 249 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred." - Martin Luther King Jr. |