We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: 반동주의자당 (Bandongjuuijadang)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4173
Description[?]:
| Mr Speaker If the other parties insist on shutting down legitimate dialogue about the need for a premiership with hysterical shrieking about "Fascism", then they must at least concede that it is entirely reasonable that the Legislative Council should be able to freely vote on who forms a government? If the likes of Angela Smith are so certain that a unity government against us can be formed, what are they afraid of? Unless of course they think that actually such a unity government would not be formed by a free vote, in which case they are opposing much needed democratic reforms for the sake of petty partisan point scoring. If Angela Smith is really so confident about her agenda she will stop blocking reform and propose her own unity cabinet herself, instead of hiding behind the mute lame duck Steward. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:45:15, February 26, 2017 CET | From | Party for Classical Liberalism | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | Mr.Speaker, We never told that there will be no free vote,There will definitely be a Free Vote on the cabinet to ensure a Functional Government in this nation.We asked the question previously and i will again,why did''nt your party propose to reestablish the post of Premier when your party held the Steward Post?Hold on till the Steward Proposes a Cabinet,Do not be in Such a Hurry to Form A Government Thank you, David Zang,Member of the Council For Santa Sharika South and PSD Council Leader |
| Date | 13:48:40, February 26, 2017 CET | From | Party for Classical Liberalism | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | That Said,We Will vote based on our alliance partners decision. David Zang |
| Date | 14:20:47, February 26, 2017 CET | From | Party for Classical Liberalism | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | After much discussion,We will vote yes to enable the creation of a unity cabinet. David Zang |
| Date | 14:35:34, February 26, 2017 CET | From | 반동주의자당 (Bandongjuuijadang) | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | What happened in the past does not matter. We are the successor to the Alternative Right Party, not the Alternative Right Party. You are making a logical fallacy that does nothing to justify your own position in the here and now. Why should the Steward have a monarchial position when it is possible the majority of the Council will not support him. What if a majority of parties vote against the Stewards proposal? Surely we should then have a right to suggest a real, workable cabinet. |
| Date | 21:03:17, February 26, 2017 CET | From | Druidic Popular Front | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We want the Steward to retain this power. A Steward with no power over the executive is effectively just a powerless symbolic figurehead, not worth the time and resources to arrange a nation-wide election for. Livia de Ruh DFP Parliamentary Leader |
| Date | 00:09:40, February 27, 2017 CET | From | 반동주의자당 (Bandongjuuijadang) | To | Debating the Constitutional Reform |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The objections of the barbarian horde front Parliamentary leader are as transparently motivated by hated of our party as they are petty and uninteresting. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 168 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 82 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda. |
| Random quote: "Real politics is the possession and distribution of power." - Benjamin Disraeli |