We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RP/OOC: Ceasation of the parties' paramilitaries.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konservative Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4182
Description[?]:
| This bill's goal is to put an end to uncontrolled use of paramilitaries. Let the SRP be an example. It Lost the election with little over 4 mn votes it is imposible that the paramilitaries of duch a small party would have 300 thousand men and women in it. Keep the game Real. those are bills like this of SRP which miałeś the game boring and irrational. aacordingly to the ław paramilitaries are controlled by the government And heavily regulated by the government and such situation in the SRP RP bill would be imposible. This bill asks for ceasation of SRP's inciting activity. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:15:37, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Sozialistische Reichs Partei (SRP) | To | Debating the RP/OOC: Ceasation of the parties' paramilitaries. |
| Message | It would not. Lol if you have 4 million votes 300.000 men is completely cool. What is your problem? |
| Date | 16:16:24, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Sozialistische Reichs Partei (SRP) | To | Debating the RP/OOC: Ceasation of the parties' paramilitaries. |
| Message | Ok ill change it to 20.000 |
| Date | 16:18:22, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Union | To | Debating the RP/OOC: Ceasation of the parties' paramilitaries. |
| Message | Do whatever you want. from now on i will not recognize any of this kind of inciting activity and cease to take part in debates. |
| Date | 17:27:09, March 16, 2017 CET | From | Fortschrittsvereinigung | To | Debating the RP/OOC: Ceasation of the parties' paramilitaries. |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Although we would prefer a total prohibition of paramilitaries, this bill is definitely a step in the right direction, we strongly support. Hannes Ellmenreich, FD Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 403 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 68 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "A man who has no office to go to - I don't care who he is - is a trial of which you can have no conception." - George Bernard Shaw |