We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B
Details
Submitted by[?]: Malivianese Militarist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2207
Description[?]:
| It is agreed that: Civil marriages are recognized by local governments. So ordered by the Assembly. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: Civil marriages are defined by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:54:48, February 09, 2006 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | No to 2, therefore no to all 3. |
| Date | 01:16:41, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Meritocratic Progressive Union | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | Article 1: Acceptable. Artticle 2: Why should we change this? Article 3: It is a right to be naked, no local governement should be allowed to take that away from our citizens. |
| Date | 05:37:17, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Malivianese Militarist Party | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | Article 2: Local governments know what is best. Marriage to objects should not be permitted. Article 3: It is NOT a right to show your private areas to others. Not only does this invite criminals in the sexual context, it is also a harmful act on our children. If the local government deems it is okay, then they know best. |
| Date | 14:00:32, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Meritocratic Progressive Union | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | Article 2: Why not? Article 3: If the children are brought up correctly then they'll know if it is apropriate or not. |
| Date | 14:57:45, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | Objects cannot give consent, which is a requirement of entering into a contract such as marriage. That said, I believe that in this nation, what one province or locality recognizes as a contract (provided that such contract has been legitimently entered into by both parties) should be recognized nationwide...such as the Full Faith and Credit act. |
| Date | 15:27:38, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Free Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | I concur with article 1 ONLY. The people must be protected from those who with sufficient arms may violate the rights of others. |
| Date | 18:25:11, February 10, 2006 CET | From | Social Democrat League | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | Article 1 is acceptable, the other are not. |
| Date | 00:31:34, February 11, 2006 CET | From |  Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | Dislike all . 1) previous behavior should not be the governing factor or future acts. 2) if someone wants to marry a toaster, who do they hurt? 3) No need to inflict your morals on the population. A person should be free to wear or not wear what they please. |
| Date | 02:19:19, February 26, 2006 CET | From | Malivianese Militarist Party | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | Previous behavior is an indicator of future acts. Marriage to a toaster is quite wrong and an exploit of tax exemptions etc. Furthermore, polygamy also provides a threat to the moral and health order within the Federation. A person may wear whatever they please; however, if that person is in the employ of the people's government, then they may not inflict their morals on the population via religious clothing. |
| Date | 14:13:05, March 28, 2006 CET | From | Free Progress Alliance | To | Debating the Civil Order Restoration Act (CORA) of 2183 Part B |
| Message | Your point regarding the toaster is specious. It cannot give consent. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 85 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 144 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 72 |
| Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum! |
| Random quote: "The political ballot box stands for willingness to be ruled by somebody other than yourself." - Alvin Lowi, Jr. |