We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Wild Animals as Pets Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (보수당)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4187
Description[?]:
| Our current law is that the matter is left to the local councils. However, although our public may enjoy having a wild animal as a pet. Do you really think it is fair on that animal though? Wild animals are becoming more endangered and some can be dangerous. Our proposal is that The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned. This means wild animals can live life properly and like a wild animal should without our interference. We need to make things safe again and prevent us from getting hurt from distressed animals who want to join their pack again and don't want to be owned by humans! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: This matter is left up to the local governments.
Current: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Proposed: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:49:48, March 24, 2017 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Wild Animals as Pets Act |
| Message | Dear Labour, While we sympathize with the intent, we believe that this bill is too restrictive as wild animal isn't properly defined. Some kinds of harmless fish(Carp species mainly) might be banned by this law so we cannot support this bill unless it changes to “The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.” Chairman Kim Minjun and owner of a rare species of wild koi National Conservative Party |
| Date | 12:52:18, March 25, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Party (보수당) | To | Debating the Wild Animals as Pets Act |
| Message | We thank the National conservative party for their comments. However, we will wait to hear from other parties before we make the necessary action |
| Date | 18:54:08, March 25, 2017 CET | From | Republican Party - 공화당 (GHD) | To | Debating the Wild Animals as Pets Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The Republican Party supports the continuation of the current policy. |
| Date | 11:16:19, March 26, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Party (보수당) | To | Debating the Wild Animals as Pets Act |
| Message | will the Republican party be willing to compromise and accept the National Conservatives suggestion? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 74 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 168 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost. |
| Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell) |