We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Health Care Reform 4186
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rutania Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4187
Description[?]:
- |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of advertising of substances classified as addictive and harmful (if general advertising by companies is permitted and sale of the addictive/harmful products is allowed).
Old value:: Advertising is restricted.
Current: Advertising is restricted and has to carry strong warning messages.
Proposed: Advertising is restricted and has to carry strong warning messages.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Listing of controversial ingredients, such as genetically modified (GM) ingredients (if food labelling is applied).
Old value:: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing, and any GM ingredients must be listed.
Current: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing must be listed. There is no requirement to disclose GM ingredients.
Proposed: Any chemicals used in agrigulture or processing must be listed. There is no requirement to disclose GM ingredients.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: There is a free public health care system and a small number of private clinics, which are heavily regulated to ensure they treat their patients well and provide good care.
Current: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Proposed: Health care is private, but is paid for by the state for people with low incomes.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: There are no laws regulating what citizens can put into their bodies.
Current: The use of cannabis is legal.
Proposed: Recreational drug use is regulated by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:39:45, March 26, 2017 CET | From | Rutania Party | To | Debating the Health Care Reform 4186 |
Message | Open to debate |
Date | 04:40:30, March 26, 2017 CET | From | Rutania Party | To | Debating the Health Care Reform 4186 |
Message | The RP intends to create fair changes to the currents health care system |
Date | 04:47:11, March 26, 2017 CET | From | Whig Party | To | Debating the Health Care Reform 4186 |
Message | We shall oppose, allowing for the criminalization of substances will hurt all, it is not sensible.We support article two, however article one would only cause everyone's medical cost to rise by eliminating the competition of the free market. |
Date | 04:57:26, March 26, 2017 CET | From | Whig Party | To | Debating the Health Care Reform 4186 |
Message | *Article 2 would cost cost to rise by distorting the market |
Date | 05:30:19, March 26, 2017 CET | From | Civic Republican League of Rutania | To | Debating the Health Care Reform 4186 |
Message | We are opposed to article 4, but would support the other three. |
Date | 15:21:24, March 26, 2017 CET | From | New People's Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Health Care Reform 4186 |
Message | We are opposed to the health care portion. |
Date | 15:21:51, March 26, 2017 CET | From | New People's Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Health Care Reform 4186 |
Message | I must be more clear. The article regarding private health care. |
Date | 20:02:32, March 26, 2017 CET | From | Whig Party | To | Debating the Health Care Reform 4186 |
Message | Although we oppose Article 4 the bill moves the Health care system in the right direction so we shall support |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 150 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 100 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
Random quote: "I think the environment should be put in the category of our national security. Defense of our resources is just as important as defense abroad. Otherwise, what is there to defend?" - Robert Redford |