Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 01:57:01
Server time: 14:02:58, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): albaniansunited | JVTA | JWDL | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Feminism Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Feministische Partei

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4188

Description[?]:

1. At least 50% of each of the party's endorsed candidates must be women and or PoC

2. At least 50% of people in every sector in every position must be women and or PoC

3. Women and Men must be paid the same yearly salary no matter what.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:42:38, March 28, 2017 CET
FromEin Dorvik
ToDebating the Feminism Act
MessageThis bill isn't feminist it is sexist.this not only restricts buissneses rights to hire who they want despite of skill!
This bill is also wrong because this gives an unequal opportunity to women! If only women can initiate a divorce it means the women in a relationship can oppress the men. There is a difference between equality and sexism, this isn't equality.
Thank you.

Freidreicj Reiksberger.

Date19:42:38, March 28, 2017 CET
FromEin Dorvik
ToDebating the Feminism Act
MessageThis bill isn't feminist it is sexist.this not only restricts buissneses rights to hire who they want despite of skill!
This bill is also wrong because this gives an unequal opportunity to women! If only women can initiate a divorce it means the women in a relationship can oppress the men. There is a difference between equality and sexism, this isn't equality.
Thank you.

Freidreicj Reiksberger.

Date19:52:22, March 28, 2017 CET
FromFreie Demokratische Union
ToDebating the Feminism Act
MessageMr.Speaker,

As a woman Myself i find this act too radical

Erica Klausenburg

Date22:58:06, March 28, 2017 CET
FromFeministische Partei
ToDebating the Feminism Act
Message"To address Rieksberger concerns we are currently living in a patriarchal society, for there to be true equality there must be injustice benefiting the oppressed people so the prejudices will be unchecked and then the government can say it is Ok when it is clearly not. Society still holds great advantages to white males. So we need radicalism for centrism."

- Ruth Dahlke Jornalist and Feminist Party candidate when ask about this in an interview.

Date23:10:19, March 28, 2017 CET
FromKonservative Union
ToDebating the Feminism Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

Oh my.... god. I really cannot find proper words to describe the idiocy which was invested while creating this bill, and I find it more difficult when trying to find words to describe the incompetency and idiocy level which was invested in justifying it. How stupid can one be to say that achieving equality requires injustice and oppression... Once again I wonder when some politicians in our country draw their morality from, how distorted one's perception of the surrounding world and reality has to be to say this idiotic words and gibberish... GOd save us from people like Mrs. Dahlke... What advantages? What advantages I ask? This idiotic statement is untrue in so many ways... We've achieved social equality of men and women long ago. Women have been serving as political, military and religious leaders in this country for decades... Patricia Ahtisaari, Ainikki Laakkonen and Mathilde Streimhoff are the best examples of the full equality of rights and priviliges. This blunder by the Feminist Party is untrue and unjustified.

Alexander Juncker,
Federal Chancellor.

Date01:21:06, March 29, 2017 CET
FromBund Demokratischer Sozialisten
ToDebating the Feminism Act
MessageMr. Speaker,

"we are currently living in a patriarchal society"
What evidence does the Feministische Partei have for such a ridiculous claim?

Michael Hinterbacher, 1. Parteivorsitzender

Date17:47:54, March 29, 2017 CET
FromFortschrittsvereinigung
ToDebating the Feminism Act
MessageMr Speaker,

A hideous example of sexism and an utter disregard for the sanctity of human life; sheer madness which we are glad to see both the left, right, centre and anyone with rationality vote down!

Kevin Cranz, FD Leader, Justice Minister

(OOC: Cheers for making a smaller bill with less proposals, much easier to take in and evaluate)

Date18:30:18, March 29, 2017 CET
FromEin Dorvik
ToDebating the Feminism Act
MessageMr speaker,
We don't live in a patriarchal society. In our party I personally ensure that race or gender had nothing to do with candidate selection or membership. In our party, in every buissnes I invest in I ensure it doesn't favour one gender or race over another. We are a far right party, does that make us rascist no, sexist no. It means we care.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 101

no
       

Total Seats: 386

abstain
 

Total Seats: 18


Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well.

Random quote: "In our age, there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia." - George Orwell

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 89