We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Speed limit policy of June 4187
Details
Submitted by[?]: Konservative Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 4188
Description[?]:
| Mr. Speaker, the federal government has established new policy concerning the speed limits on public roads and motorways to ensure the security of the road network users across our nation. https://i.imgsafe.org/ac538afdbd.png Alexander Juncker, Federal Chancellor. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:58:41, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Freie Demokratische Union | To | Debating the Speed limit policy of June 4187 |
| Message | OOC:-Great! |
| Date | 13:07:27, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Fortschrittsvereinigung | To | Debating the Speed limit policy of June 4187 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, This proposal is impossibly vague. What measurement of speed is being taken here exactly? Is it mph, if so these speeds are generally too fast. Different speeds at different times of day is a move our party sees as unnecessary, in addition isn't it more sensible for local governments to set their own speed limits instead? Kevin Cranz, FD Leader, Justice Minister (OOC: pretty good for RP, just think there should be a more thorough proposal before putting it into law) |
| Date | 13:28:41, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Union | To | Debating the Speed limit policy of June 4187 |
| Message | I do not regał our country using imperial system. It has always been metric system. Higher Speed limits at night are reasonable and make the traffic more efficent. A. Juncker |
| Date | 13:30:18, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Union | To | Debating the Speed limit policy of June 4187 |
| Message | Both Kirlawa and Alioria use metric system so we find reminding that we use metric system as well unecessary. A. Jucker |
| Date | 13:33:55, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Union | To | Debating the Speed limit policy of June 4187 |
| Message | And to conplete my answer, KU find it unecessary and irrational to transfer the jurisdiction over the Speed limit Policy to the local governments. Uniform Speed limit policy increses the safety of travel and eliminates the confusion caused by the variety of Speed limits. A. Juncker |
| Date | 17:52:28, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Fortschrittsvereinigung | To | Debating the Speed limit policy of June 4187 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Surely different locations have different speed needs however. Kevin Cranz, FD Leader, Justice Minister (OOC: My apologies, in the UK we use mph, I'm not used to metric measurements on the road) |
| Date | 17:59:45, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Konservative Union | To | Debating the Speed limit policy of June 4187 |
| Message | Mr. Cranz, But this is the unifom speed limit and can be regulated by the local governments. Different locations? Of course they do, you have to travel at maximum speed of 30 kph in the vicinity of a school or a hospital. You don't seem to understand my point. In a hypothetical situation, you're driving a car on the A1 highwa and in Kordusia you are allowed to travel at 160 kph and once you cross Kordusian-Largonian border you are required to slow down to 110 kph and it can be quite conusing not only on the motorway. This regultion prevents from thak kind of situation. Alexander Juncker, Federal Chancellor. |
| Date | 22:53:29, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Fortschrittsvereinigung | To | Debating the Speed limit policy of June 4187 |
| Message | Federal Chancellor, We thank you for going more in depth and explaining the bill better. With all this in mind, we shall now support. Kevin Cranz, FD Leader, Justice Minister |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 487 | ||||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 18 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "The state is nothing but an instrument of oppression of one class by another, no less so in a democratic republic than in a monarchy." - John Smith |