We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: P.d.l. 10/87 - Border controls
Details
Submitted by[?]: Popolari per l'Istalia - U.o.L.
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 4188
Description[?]:
Romulo Mursia, PPI-U.o.L.: "Protect our borders!" |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Travel by foreigners to the nation.
Old value:: The nation imposes minimal border controls on visitors, with cursory security checks, to confirm visitor identities.
Current: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Proposed: The nation imposes strict border control on visitors, with intensive security checks, to maintain law and order.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:17:04, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Alleanza Radicale - NCD | To | Debating the P.d.l. 10/87 - Border controls |
Message | Giuseppe Al-Walid, Whip of PSLI: "Defend the frontier from what? We have relations with so much nations also for our open policies! We are floaded by turist! Our national parks, our historic city and testimoniancies of the ancient civilizations, the lust plage of Alaria! The nation should vote compact against this law! For the good of our economy and our workers! We should attract the people!" |
Date | 23:11:00, March 29, 2017 CET | From | Fronte Socialista - A.P.I. | To | Debating the P.d.l. 10/87 - Border controls |
Message | "Our borders controls do not need to be tightened. This will only scare off tourists coming into our beautiful nation! This type of fear mongering should not be tolerated!" Romana Carlin, Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 225 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 410 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all." - Maximilien Robespierre |