We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ensuring Personal Freedoms
Details
Submitted by[?]: Lutte Féministe de Libération
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2185
Description[?]:
Eminent domain constitutes the forceful removal of a property's rightful owners by a vengeful majority. What can not be taken by compromise should not be demanded by force. This is government at it's worst, especially since eminent domain often is an attack on those in the lower and middle class, the less influential, and rarely seizes the land of the priveleged and powerful. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:47:25, February 11, 2006 CET | From | Front Canrillaise | To | Debating the Ensuring Personal Freedoms |
Message | Supported. |
Date | 14:28:44, February 11, 2006 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Ensuring Personal Freedoms |
Message | We support. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 165 | |||
no | Total Seats: 197 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 196 |
Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
Random quote: "Too bad all the people who know how to run the country are busy driving taxi cabs and cutting hair." - George Burns |