We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of May 4198
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democrat Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 4199
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Social Democrat Alliance
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Sunrise Party 해돋이당
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Conservative Party (보수당)
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Social Democrat Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Sunrise Party 해돋이당
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Conservative Party (보수당)
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Social Democrat Alliance
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Sunrise Party 해돋이당
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Social Democrat Alliance
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Conservative Party (보수당)
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Sunrise Party 해돋이당
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Conservative Party (보수당)
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Social Democrat Alliance
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:42:46, April 19, 2017 CET | From | Social Democrat Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4198 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, As president Scott declared, we in the SDA believe that this coalition best reflects the wishes of the Dranland population. The GNP has lost dramatically, and the racist-extremist PAP can’t be trusted after the tenure of their last president. The Conservatives and the SDA are the biggest democratic winners of the election, and Labour makes this coalition a majority. We would ask the other parties to support this coalition for the coming years to further strengthen the democracy, the welfare and the economy of Free Dranland. With regards, SDA Party Chairman |
| Date | 17:46:40, April 19, 2017 CET | From | Sunrise Party 해돋이당 | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4198 |
| Message | We can support this coalition. |
| Date | 17:48:56, April 19, 2017 CET | From | Social Democrat Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4198 |
| Message | We thank the Conservatives, and we hope to achieve a lot together! |
| Date | 17:49:47, April 19, 2017 CET | From | Conservative Party (보수당) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4198 |
| Message | We will also support the coalition |
| Date | 17:50:07, April 19, 2017 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4198 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, the GNP will not support this coalition. We acknowledge that we have to mandate to claim a part in the government that is going to lead Dranland throughout the upcoming tenure, but an inclusion of the NCP is a worrisome signal. The party might have moderated and its recent contributions to the peace process are commendable, but it retains a significant Kyo nationalist wing whose influence should not be underestimated. The SDA may be right in shunning the PAP, but if it does so due to that party's supposed "racist-extremist" nature, then it must explain why the NCP should be a more suitable partner when subjected to that standard. Lucretia Llewellyn-Evans MLC GNP Parliamentary Leader |
| Date | 17:52:09, April 19, 2017 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4198 |
| Message | Correction: it should have been "no mandate" in the first sentence. |
| Date | 17:53:09, April 19, 2017 CET | From | Social Democrat Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4198 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The GNP is partly right. In the past we have had issues with the Conservatives. However, there stance has moderated significantly. They also voted with many Bills of the previous coalition, against some of which the GNP campaigned. We feel that in the new power-balance the NCP deserves the chance to prove what they have been telling for years: that they have changed. The SDA |
| Date | 18:01:58, April 19, 2017 CET | From | Grand National Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of May 4198 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, the bills named by the SDA that were supported by the NCP were of economic nature, whereas the problematic aspects of the NCP's agenda are related to their negative outlook on multiculturalism and their ambivalent stance towards democratic governance. We do not see how these votes can be interpreted as an indication of the NCP having moderated its political profile to a sufficient extent. We nevertheless wish the President as well as our former coalition partners well and hope that they will not wake up to find themselves in shock over being wedded to unreconstructed Kyo nationalists once the honeymoon is over. Lucretia Llewellyn-Evans MLC GNP Parliamentary Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 149 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 35 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 71 |
| Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
| Random quote: "An idealist is one who, on noticing that roses smell better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H. L. Mencken |