Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 00:09:07
Server time: 15:50:52, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): HopesFor | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Wage Gap Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progression

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 4202

Description[?]:

This legislation aims to increase wages while at the same time will reduce the inequality between the salaries of executives, managers and staff.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:10:19, April 25, 2017 CET
FromAssociation of Consumers and Taxpayers
ToDebating the Wage Gap Bill
MessageStrongly oppose.

Date05:31:27, April 26, 2017 CET
FromPatriots Party
ToDebating the Wage Gap Bill
MessageWe support Article 2 of this proposal but Article 1 is a strict no-go for our party. We will not have this great nation held to ransom by Labour Unions. We ask the Progression party to amend this bill.

Date09:40:44, April 26, 2017 CET
FromProgression
ToDebating the Wage Gap Bill
MessageArticle 1 involves unions and employers' organisations - we believe that is quite fair. The fact that CEOs can earn 200 times more than office workers is grotesque.

Date10:00:40, April 26, 2017 CET
FromPatriots Party
ToDebating the Wage Gap Bill
MessageIt's sad that we cannot work together on this bill but again we must stress that we will support article 2 if it is ever put forward on its own. Until such time we cannot support this bill.

Date11:42:34, April 26, 2017 CET
FromProgression
ToDebating the Wage Gap Bill
MessageIt is a shame that the PP will not support dialogue between employers and employees.

Date12:06:44, April 26, 2017 CET
FromPatriots Party
ToDebating the Wage Gap Bill
MessageIt's a shame that Progression wishes to have a socialist wage cap put in place, again we must stress that we will back the 'living wage' proposal.

Date12:50:20, April 26, 2017 CET
FromProgression
ToDebating the Wage Gap Bill
MessageA wage cap to tackle gross inequality - or is that something PP supports? They claim they exist to support all Luthorians - the fact is they only support the wealthy ones.

Date16:17:17, April 26, 2017 CET
FromPatriots Party
ToDebating the Wage Gap Bill
MessageA wage cap to punish those who work hard and earn vital jobs and taxes for our nations people. How can you state we are for the wealthy only when we have lauded your proposal in article 2. We will be as constructive as possible with other parties, I just wish the same could be said for Progression when met with an alternative view.

Date17:29:47, April 26, 2017 CET
FromProgression
ToDebating the Wage Gap Bill
MessageManual workers labour extremely hard yet earn some of the lowest salaries in the country, while CEOs can go to the golf course whenever they feel like and still receive millions of pounds in bonuses.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 324

no
  

Total Seats: 0

abstain
   

Total Seats: 323


Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America).

Random quote: "We had no domestic attacks under Bush." - Rudy Giuliani

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65