We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sexual Freedoms Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progression
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4202
Description[?]:
| This bill looks to liberalise obscenity laws in order to increase liberty and to free-up police time. It will also confrim the right to dress however one desires. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: All sexually implicit actions are illegal in public.
Current: Local governments may regulate laws on public acts of affection and obscenity.
Proposed: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning crossdressing.
Current: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Proposed: Crossdressing is allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:45:10, April 26, 2017 CET | From | Association of Consumers and Taxpayers | To | Debating the Sexual Freedoms Bill |
| Message | Support. |
| Date | 05:20:17, April 27, 2017 CET | From | Patriots Party | To | Debating the Sexual Freedoms Bill |
| Message | We oppose this motion on the grounds of article 2. |
| Date | 09:23:53, April 27, 2017 CET | From | Progression | To | Debating the Sexual Freedoms Bill |
| Message | Why should the state regulate what people wear? |
| Date | 11:01:58, April 27, 2017 CET | From | Patriots Party | To | Debating the Sexual Freedoms Bill |
| Message | Why should they wear anything in all if thats the case? We need to have morals to set this great nation up for a prosperous future. |
| Date | 12:11:48, April 27, 2017 CET | From | Progression | To | Debating the Sexual Freedoms Bill |
| Message | What does morality have to do with clothing? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 323 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 324 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "There is a mandate to impose a voluntary return to traditional values." - Ronald Reagan |