We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Abolishment of Eminent Domain and the Protection of Private Property Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nationalist Party of Yindala (GMD)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 4210
Description[?]:
X |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:04:34, May 11, 2017 CET | From | 道家黨 (Taoist Party) | To | Debating the Abolishment of Eminent Domain and the Protection of Private Property Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, We fully support the bill since it fully protects private ownership. Chen Jiajun Concord Party Caucus Chairman in Grand Assembly |
Date | 18:43:50, May 11, 2017 CET | From | Liberal Progressivist Party of Yingdala | To | Debating the Abolishment of Eminent Domain and the Protection of Private Property Act |
Message | We fully support the bill. |
Date | 22:37:06, May 11, 2017 CET | From | Yingdala Progressive-Republicans | To | Debating the Abolishment of Eminent Domain and the Protection of Private Property Act |
Message | This bill would make future infrastructure development virtually impossible. Protection of private property is important but should not be absolute. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 182 | |||
no | Total Seats: 257 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 61 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "If men want to oppose war, it is statism that they must oppose." - Ayn Rand |