Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5476
Next month in: 01:37:56
Server time: 14:22:03, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AethanKal | burgerboys | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Abolishment of Eminent Domain and the Protection of Private Property Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Nationalist Party of Yindala (GMD)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 4210

Description[?]:

X

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:04:34, May 11, 2017 CET
From道家黨 (Taoist Party)
ToDebating the Abolishment of Eminent Domain and the Protection of Private Property Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We fully support the bill since it fully protects private ownership.

Chen Jiajun

Concord Party Caucus Chairman in Grand Assembly

Date18:43:50, May 11, 2017 CET
FromLiberal Progressivist Party of Yingdala
ToDebating the Abolishment of Eminent Domain and the Protection of Private Property Act
MessageWe fully support the bill.

Date22:37:06, May 11, 2017 CET
FromYingdala Progressive-Republicans
ToDebating the Abolishment of Eminent Domain and the Protection of Private Property Act
MessageThis bill would make future infrastructure development virtually impossible. Protection of private property is important but should not be absolute.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 182

no
 

Total Seats: 257

abstain
 

Total Seats: 61


Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

Random quote: "If men want to oppose war, it is statism that they must oppose." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54