We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212
Details
Submitted by[?]: New People's Party of Rutania
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 4212
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
New People's Party of Rutania
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Project Rutania
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the 
Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Project Rutania
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the New People's Party of Rutania
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Democratic Socialist Party of Rutania
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Civic Republican League of Rutania
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the New People's Party of Rutania
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Project Rutania
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Civic Republican League of Rutania
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Civic Republican League of Rutania
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the New People's Party of Rutania
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:32:57, May 17, 2017 CET | From | New People's Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We must put aside our differences, we do not currently have a PM. |
| Date | 02:33:30, May 17, 2017 CET | From | New People's Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We must put aside our differences, we do not currently have a PM. |
| Date | 03:06:38, May 17, 2017 CET | From | Rutania Party | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr Speacker, Why would any of the other parties back a minority government like this one? |
| Date | 03:24:25, May 17, 2017 CET | From | New People's Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Because they would rather have a cabinet with real and clear ideas rather than one that pretends to be centrists but govern from the far-right. |
| Date | 11:49:48, May 17, 2017 CET | From | Rutania Party | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The RP have no idea where the PPR have come up with this idea that the RP has been or ever clamed to be a Centrist Party. We have always made it clear in are policies, when speaking as seen in the last Senate porposal, and even in our charter, we are a Nationalist Party. As for being "far right" another ludicrous accusation by the PPR, yes we learn right on a fair amount of issues, be we are by no means "far right" there are other parties in the nation that fit that description much better, and if the PPR want proof, look at how the RP vote on labour rights, and look at who will often ask the right wing parties to moderate there bills. We ask that those from PPR the no conflate everyone that opposes the far-left as right-wing extremists. |
| Date | 19:58:08, May 17, 2017 CET | From | United Democratic Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The Left are clearly desperate for power, this cabinet is badly put together. The country voted differently than what is being proposed. The public voted for a large Rutania Party and they should be the ones putting in a PM. UDPR Party Representative, Duane Harry Golver |
| Date | 21:43:22, May 17, 2017 CET | From | New People's Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The Rutania Party founded the Rutanian Centrist's Assembly. That is where we got the idea. |
| Date | 21:44:34, May 17, 2017 CET | From | New People's Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, The PPR is desperate for change, for rights and for progress. The country also voted for the parties included in this. |
| Date | 22:55:48, May 17, 2017 CET | From | Rutania Party | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker Perhaps if the PPR made less radical demands and was more willing to debate there porposal rather then just pushing them through to the voting stage, they would have more success. |
| Date | 23:17:11, May 17, 2017 CET | From | United Democratic Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We agree with what the Rutania Party have said, without co-operation from both sides we won't get anywhere and they are the ones pushing for a motion of no-confidence. UDPR Party Representative, Duane Harry Golver |
| Date | 03:37:20, May 19, 2017 CET | From | New People's Party of Rutania | To | Debating the Alternative Cabinet Proposal of 4212 |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, Repeating what the RP said earlier, we are always open to debate. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 254 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 192 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 278 |
| Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
| Random quote: "With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day." - Martin Luther King Jr. |