We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Weaponry Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutori Freedom Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2186
Description[?]:
Seriously, we're going to let people walk around with machine guns? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, and there are further restrictions on places where they may be carried.
Proposed: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:53:01, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Northern Lights | To | Debating the Weaponry Act |
Message | agree |
Date | 22:37:19, February 14, 2006 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Weaponry Act |
Message | Disagree, it is an unfair restriction on the freedoms of the populace. |
Date | 00:13:54, February 15, 2006 CET | From | Northern Lights | To | Debating the Weaponry Act |
Message | an unfair restriction? like you can't drive a tank on the street? |
Date | 02:07:36, February 15, 2006 CET | From | Democratic-Republican Party | To | Debating the Weaponry Act |
Message | disagree. We would agree with gun control, but not with gun restriction. |
Date | 02:08:37, February 15, 2006 CET | From | Democratic-Republican Party | To | Debating the Weaponry Act |
Message | After a close party vote, we have changed our vote. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 124 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 123 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag |