We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: OOC/RP: Supreme Court of Beluzia
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 4291
Description[?]:
| Members: (RP party)(Year approved) Chief Justice: Jerold Whitaker(UP)(4218) Justice: Nellie Franklyn(UP)(4218) Justice: Gorden Gibb(UP)(4218) Justice: Hiram Lyubomir Robson(PRRP)(4218) Justice: Katriona Juliet Dyson(PRRP)(4218) Justice: Nicole Ford(S&D of Beluzia)(4227) Justice: Eble d'Arbrisel(S&D of Beluzia)(4227) Justice: Tony Smith(Labour)(4227) Justice: Simon Akers(Labour)(4227) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Cases Current: |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:08:08, May 23, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Supreme Court of Beluzia |
| Message | OOC: First off we need to decide how RPing the Court will work. We know how appointments works, but now who will RP the Justices. |
| Date | 22:08:52, May 23, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Supreme Court of Beluzia |
| Message | But I will begin making appointments now. |
| Date | 22:11:53, May 23, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Supreme Court of Beluzia |
| Message | OOC: I would like to nominate 2 Justices who will be RPed by each party, than a 3rd one from the UPB, as the president's party at time of these nominations, to be RPed by the party they are from. If we do this please make the Justices nonpartisan, and rule based on actual constitutional amendments. |
| Date | 12:29:27, May 27, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Supreme Court of Beluzia |
| Message | OOC: Could the Liberal, BRRP, and BFP submit 2 Justices, they can't be politicians, to the president via messages. I will then announce the nominees and begin the confirmations |
| Date | 04:24:01, June 06, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Supreme Court of Beluzia |
| Message | Roberto Schneider, deputy Chair of the UPB is challenging the nullification of his appointment as speaker of the Congress as illegal OOC; note this should not be seen as the opinion of the whole party or the president just Mr. Schneider and some MCs |
| Date | 11:17:13, October 21, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Supreme Court of Beluzia |
| Message | Archiving, now defunct due to repeal of RP Constitution. |
| Date | 16:09:44, October 21, 2017 CET | From | Beluzian Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Supreme Court of Beluzia |
| Message | We demand half of all justices for the NOU. |
| Date | 11:28:46, October 22, 2017 CET | From | United Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP: Supreme Court of Beluzia |
| Message | This bill is just a list of what the Supreme Court was before it fell out of use like the rest of the constitution |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 299 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 230 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 221 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them." - Bill Vaughn |