Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:08:47
Server time: 19:51:12, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): ImportantGuy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Land for the landless

Details

Submitted by[?]: Luthori Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2187

Description[?]:

A policy of encouraging small scale, ecolocically sustainable agricultural development will mean that our people can feed themselves whilst having minimal environmental impact.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:12:42, February 14, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Land for the landless
MessageAye. The CUP strongly approves of the EGP's new direction.

Date17:02:26, February 14, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Green Party
ToDebating the Land for the landless
MessageYes.

Date17:31:32, February 14, 2006 CET
FromShuggoth Progressive Party
ToDebating the Land for the landless
MessageRedistributing the land is socialism!

Date17:38:16, February 14, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Democratic Party
ToDebating the Land for the landless
MessageActually no it's not. This does not call for collective ownership. From a historical point of view land redistribution was a major factor in the change from feudal to capitalist systems.

Anyway, tell us why you don't support it rather than what you think it's called.

Date21:06:52, February 14, 2006 CET
FromShuggoth Progressive Party
ToDebating the Land for the landless
MessageEither a person owns his land or he doesn't. You can't have it both ways.

If he owns his land, he should be able to use it as he sees fit. Allowing the State to step in and redistribute the land obviously is taking his ownership of that land away from him. You can nitpick if you like, but this is an attack on private property. And private property is core value of our entire economy!

We are also opposed to the State subsidy of agriculture.

Date10:31:16, February 16, 2006 CET
FromLuthori Democratic Party
ToDebating the Land for the landless
MessageThis bill represents a model of agricultural development which can achieve great things for the Luthori people, it will tacle the vastly unequal ownership of land in the country, provide the rural poor with the means to provide for themselves without reliance on the state and will encourage the production of food using techniques which will enhance and protect our environment. If an abstract notion of 'property rights' is more important to you than the ability of Luthori people to feed themselves then I can only shake my head in sadness.

Date13:04:25, February 16, 2006 CET
FromCovenanters (IA)
ToDebating the Land for the landless
MessageHear, hear!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 254

no
     

Total Seats: 496

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Check out the forum regularly for game news. http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "Idealism is fine; but as it approaches reality, the cost becomes prohibitive." - William F. Buckley, Jr.

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 68