Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5477
Next month in: 03:18:57
Server time: 20:41:02, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | albaniansunited | Infinite | JourneyJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Education for All Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Populist Islamic Workers' League

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2187

Description[?]:

The early years of learning are some of the most important.

Private schools are notorious for hiring unqualified teachers. They are not giving Indralan children the education they need. The rich and elite of Indrala now only have private toutors for the children; this is building up the RDP's aristorcacy. It must end!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:09:53, February 14, 2006 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the Education for All Act
Message"The early years of learning are some of the most important." Is that why you want to ruin them with state monopoly and red tape?

Date00:44:54, February 15, 2006 CET
FromPopulist Islamic Workers' League
ToDebating the Education for All Act
MessageThere is far more red tape in having to have the government wire you money and check to see if you are "poor". Most private schools are not of the same quality as our public schools.

Date01:29:56, February 15, 2006 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the Education for All Act
MessageWhich public schools? They are all private now.

OOC: In the RL countries I am aware of (Chile, UK, FL, GA), private schools are, on average, waaaay better than public schools, even though their costs per pupil are lower.

Date06:18:50, February 15, 2006 CET
FromLiberal Party of Indrala
ToDebating the Education for All Act
MessageThe problem of finding out whether a family is poor enough to gain benefits is obsolete, as almost all areas that are now private are subsidised for poor families. Do you think we would keep it so a means test is required for every claim? Of course not, if a family is eligable for one subsidy they will be eligable for another.

Date00:28:11, February 16, 2006 CET
FromRadical Democratic Party
ToDebating the Education for All Act
MessageQuite apart of the (nil) merits of this bill, we would appreciate if the RGSP would allow 8 months' debate before sending it to the vote, per the Bill Drafting Guidelines.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 47

no
  

Total Seats: 52

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval.

    Random quote: "If a female president can come here and be treated equally, why can't any other woman?" - Jewell C. Stillman, former Lourennais politician (on equal rights in Badara)

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 61