Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:08:39
Server time: 06:51:20, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): blowingnorthwind | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Brahms Accords

Details

Submitted by[?]: Whig Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 4221

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Brahms Accords. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:56:51, May 31, 2017 CET
FromWhig Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Brahms Accords
MessageMr. Speaker,

It is the opinion of myself and the Foreign Secretary that despite the merits and many good things in these accords we must not ratify the agreement since it is not guaranteed by the agreement that all signatory nations will maintain proper records of their citizens such as identification cards.

Prime Minister Elmer Clark

Date01:25:06, June 01, 2017 CET
FromRutania Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Brahms Accords
MessageMr. Speaker

RP agree and can not exsept the open bored policy

Date06:54:19, June 01, 2017 CET
FromUnited Democratic Party of Rutania
ToDebating the Ratification of the Brahms Accords
MessageMr Speaker,

We agree and still disagree with Article 4.1

Nikolas Jaymes Love,
UDPR Party Representative

Date16:52:21, June 03, 2017 CET
FromWhig Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Brahms Accords
MessageMr. Speaker

I would like to reiterate that Article 4.1 allows national laws and regulations to override the articles of the Treaty, so this shouldn't be considered an open border agreement.

Date05:40:50, June 04, 2017 CET
FromWhig Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Brahms Accords
MessageMr. Speaker,

I would like to ask our friends in the Rutania Party to reconsider their vote, the language in the Accords does state that national law supersedes the policy recommended by the Brahm Accords and our national policy is to not allow open borders. Not ratifying these Accords would be a great tragedy of our time and I believe history will view not ratifying a national mistake. The provisions allowing for and encouraging the expansion of commerce and industry are a great opportunity for Rutania.

Prime Minister Elmer Clark

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 342

no
 

Total Seats: 57

abstain
   

Total Seats: 325


Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated.

Random quote: "Sometimes democracy must be bathed in blood." - Augusto Pinochet

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 51