Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:53:48
Server time: 20:06:11, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Energy Generation Ownership Act of 2185

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Mordusian Green Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2188

Description[?]:

Hyman Datte, the new Minister of Infrastructure and Transport, has suggested to the Assembly that ownership of power stations be changed.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:18:35, February 15, 2006 CET
FromNational Thomasian Party
ToDebating the The Energy Generation Ownership Act of 2185
MessageWe are against. By keeping energy production split amongst several private companies we can encourage healthy competition in the energy sector.

Date12:45:37, February 15, 2006 CET
FromThe Mordusian Green Party
ToDebating the The Energy Generation Ownership Act of 2185
MessageIf the benefit of splitting energy production among several companies is price, we must suggest that this is not the only way to control prices. They can be set by the public co-operative that would "own" the power stations in the proposed measure.

Date13:01:13, February 15, 2006 CET
FromAgrarian Party of Mordusia
ToDebating the The Energy Generation Ownership Act of 2185
MessageI must admit, the prices do not go down by privitising the sector, but the quality increases.

A contract with a private firm has the advantage of providing a safe insurance, while the government "rules supreme".

Date04:19:09, February 16, 2006 CET
FromThe Mordusian Green Party
ToDebating the The Energy Generation Ownership Act of 2185
MessageWe reject the assertion the quality control rises once the commercial sector takes control of energy generation. Sure, prices may temporarily dip one business takes over energy generation, in order to entice consumers into the trap. Once businesses realizes they have consumers by the short and curlies, prices will rise again. By the same token, quality will decline, since the cabal of businesses that run energy production will work in cooperation to keep prices as low as possible and profits as high as possible.

Date07:27:02, February 16, 2006 CET
FromAgrarian Party of Mordusia
ToDebating the The Energy Generation Ownership Act of 2185
Message"Cabal of Businesses". I like that. We might support.

Date19:15:13, February 16, 2006 CET
FromNational Thomasian Party
ToDebating the The Energy Generation Ownership Act of 2185
MessageThe new party supports.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 106

no
    

Total Seats: 397

abstain
  

Total Seats: 96


Random fact: Once approved, players should copy Cultural Protocols into a bill in the debate section of their nation page, under the title of "OOC: Cultural Protocols". This bill should include links to the passed Cultural Protocol bill and the Moderation approval.

Random quote: "We must show that liberty is not merely one particular value but that it is the source and condition of most moral values. What a free society offers to the individual is much more than what he would be able to do if only he were free. We can therefore not fully appreciate the value of freedom until we know how a society of free men as a whole differs from one in which unfreedom prevails." - Friedrich August Hayek

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57